Skip to main content
Glama

Attach uploaded audio to an episode

publisher_attach_audio
Idempotent

Confirm a finished upload and mark that episode live. Verifies the file really landed in storage before changing anything, then points the episode at it so it appears in your RSS feed on the next build. Attaches ONE upload to ONE episode you own.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
keyYesThe key returned by publisher_upload_audio.
tokenYesYour publisher access token.
tenant_slugYesYour publisher slug on storyflo.
episode_slugYesEpisode to attach it to.

TDQS

A4.4/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Beyond the annotations (readOnly false, destructive false, idempotent true), the description discloses verification before mutation, the RSS feed impact on the next build, and the one-to-one ownership constraint. This adds substantial behavioral context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is three sentences, each serving a distinct purpose: the action, the verification mechanism, and the scope. No redundancy or fluff.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers purpose, prerequisites, effects, and constraints. It lacks explicit return value or error behavior, but for a mutation tool with no output schema, the provided context is sufficient for an agent to select and invoke the tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already provides descriptions for all 4 parameters, including referencing publisher_upload_audio for the key. The description adds the one-to-one constraint but does not provide additional parameter-level detail beyond what the schema covers.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool confirms a finished upload and attaches it to an episode, making it live. It distinguishes from sibling publisher_upload_audio by specifying the attach step and the RSS feed effect.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage after upload via the key reference and 'Confirm a finished upload'. It does not explicitly name alternatives, but the context is clear enough for an agent to infer the correct sequence.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.6/5.0
Disambiguation4/5

Most tools have distinct purposes, but there is overlap between `get_my_private_feed`, `subscribe_topic`, and `list_subscriptions`—all return or manage feed URLs, which could confuse an agent. Otherwise, categories like publisher, fund manager, and search tools are clearly separated.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tools use consistent snake_case with a verb_noun pattern (e.g., `get_article`, `search_articles`, `publisher_upload_audio`). Exceptions like `digest` are single-word verbs but still fit the pattern. No mixed conventions are present.

Tool Count2/5

With 37 tools, the server exceeds the 25-tool threshold considered 'too many' by the rubric. While the broad scope (news, podcasting, publishing, fund management, embedding) justifies a large surface, the count still adds cognitive load and would benefit from splitting into separate servers.

Completeness4/5

The tool set covers the major domains: search, retrieval, subscriptions, publishing, fund manager operations, and embedder network. Minor gaps exist, such as the absence of an unsubscribe or delete-episode tool, but the core workflows are well-supported and agents can accomplish most tasks.

Resources