Skip to main content
Glama

Remove From Watchlist

remove_from_watchlist
DestructiveIdempotent

Remove one company from the authenticated user's default StockLens portfolio. Does NOT execute trades and does NOT delete a recorded holding or its transactions; a holding with recorded transactions cannot be removed through this tool. Does NOT accept more than one ticker per call.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
tickerYesStock ticker symbol (e.g. AAPL). Exactly one ticker per call.
exchangeNoExchange code (e.g. NASDAQ). Optional. When omitted, the ticker is matched against the portfolio; if it is there on more than one exchange you will be asked which.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
scopeYes
tickerYes
removedYes
exchangeYes
total_holdingsYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / ticker / pattern
      Previous value: -"^[A-Za-z][A-Za-z.\\-]{0,9}$"New value: +"^[A-Za-z0-9][A-Za-z0-9.\\-]{0,19}$"
  2. Changed3 schema fields changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / exchange / description
      Previous value: -"Exchange code (e.g. NASDAQ). Optional — when omitted, the ticker is matched against your own watchlist; if it is tracked on more than one exchange you will be asked which one."New value: +"Exchange code (e.g. NASDAQ). Optional. When omitted, the ticker is matched against the portfolio; if it is there on more than one exchange you will be asked which."
    • addedInput schema / properties / exchange / enum
      Added value: +[
      +  "NYSE",
      +  "NASDAQ",
      +  "AMEX",
      +  "OTC",
      +  "CBOE",
      +  "TSX",
      +  "TSXV",
      +  "CNQ",
      +  "NEO",
      +  "MEX",
      +  "B3",
      +  "SANTIAGO",
      +  "BUE",
      +  "BVC",
      +  "LSE",
      +  "EURONEXT_PARIS",
      +  "EURONEXT_AMSTERDAM",
      +  "EURONEXT_BRUSSELS",
      +  "EURONEXT_LISBON",
      +  "EURONEXT_DUBLIN",
      +  "XETRA",
      +  "SIX",
      +  "BME",
      +  "MILAN",
      +  "OSLO",
      +  "OMX_STOCKHOLM",
      +  "OMX_HELSINKI",
      +  "OMX_COPENHAGEN",
      +  "WSE",
      +  "VIE",
      +  "ATH",
      +  "PRA",
      +  "BUD",
      +  "IST",
      +  "ICE",
      +  "RIS",
      +  "TAL",
      +  "MCX",
      +  "TSE",
      +  "HKEX",
      +  "SHANGHAI",
      +  "SHENZHEN",
      +  "ASX",
      +  "TWSE",
      +  "SGX",
      +  "NSE",
      +  "KRX",
      +  "BSE",
      +  "KOE",
      +  "JKT",
      +  "KLS",
      +  "SET",
      +  "NZE",
      +  "HOSE",
      +  "TWO",
      +  "TADAWUL",
      +  "JSE",
      +  "TLV",
      +  "DFM",
      +  "EGX",
      +  "DOH",
      +  "KUW"
      +]
    • changedInput schema / properties / ticker / description
      Previous value: -"Stock ticker symbol to remove from the watchlist (e.g. AAPL). Exactly one ticker per call."New value: +"Stock ticker symbol (e.g. AAPL). Exactly one ticker per call."
  3. Added

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already mark the tool as destructive and idempotent; the description adds crucial context that removing from the watchlist does not affect recorded holdings or transactions. It also specifies that only one ticker per call is allowed, which is behavioral guidance beyond the annotation flags.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three short sentences front-load the primary action, followed by two exclusions and a constraint. There is no redundancy or filler; every sentence earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With two parameters, one required, a full schema, annotations, and an output schema, the description covers the essential behavior including exclusions and constraints. An agent has sufficient detail to decide when and how to invoke remove_from_watchlist correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, with both ticker and exchange parameters already well described. The description's main contribution is confirming the single-ticker constraint, which mirrors the schema, and clarifying that removal applies to the default portfolio, so it adds minimal new parameter-specific meaning.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb ('Remove') and resource ('one company from the authenticated user's default StockLens portfolio'), and explicitly distinguishes itself from trade execution and transaction deletion. This makes it clearly distinguishable from sibling tools like add_to_watchlist, which perform the inverse operation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description clearly states the intended action and adds negative guidance: it does not execute trades, does not delete holdings/transactions, and holdings with recorded transactions cannot be removed. While it does not name alternative tools explicitly, the context and sibling list make the use case unambiguous.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources