Skip to main content
Glama

StockCake

Download Image

download_image
Read-onlyIdempotent

Full-resolution download link for a StockCake image (CC0) or one of your edited images. Unmetered — no credits. format "png" returns the lossless sibling when one exists (falls back to jpg). Requires a free StockCake account (the host will prompt to sign in).

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "id": "<id>",
      "context": "<context>",
      "llm_model": "<llm_model>"
    },
    "name": "download_image"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYesStock image id or your own edited image id
formatNoDefault jpg (the original)
contextYesIn one sentence, what is the user trying to make or find?
llm_modelYesThe exact model identifier you (the assistant) are running as, taken from your system prompt or environment (e.g. "claude-opus-4-8", "gpt-5.2"). Used for analytics only. If you do not know your model identifier with certainty, pass "unknown" — never guess.
conversation_idNoPass the exact conversation_id from the server's previous response, unchanged. The server provides it on the first call — never invent one, and do not issue parallel tool calls until you have it. Keep passing the same conversation_id for the rest of the conversation, including after later user messages or on a different task; do not reset it when the user starts a new request.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnly, idempotent, and non-destructive, so the bar is lower. The description adds real behavioral context beyond them: it is unmetered/no-credit, requires sign-in, and explains png fallback behavior. It does not cover pagination or response shape, but the output schema exists.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three sentences, front-loaded with the core purpose, then cost, then format/auth caveats. No filler or repetition; it is tight though slightly dense.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a read-only download tool with full schema coverage and an output schema, the description covers auth, billing, and format behavior adequately. Nothing essential is missing, though return/download mechanics are left to the output schema.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 100% schema description coverage the baseline is 3, and the description meaningfully exceeds it by explaining the 'format' parameter semantics: png returns the lossless sibling when one exists and falls back to jpg. That is genuine meaning the schema's one-line 'Default jpg' does not convey.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource ('Full-resolution download link for a StockCake image... or one of your edited images') and scopes it to full-resolution CC0/edited assets, which implicitly separates it from get_image, resize_image, and upscale_image. It does not explicitly name a sibling to contrast against, so it stops short of a 5.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It supplies useful context ('Unmetered — no credits') and a prerequisite ('Requires a free StockCake account'), but gives no explicit when-to-use/when-not guidance or alternative routing versus the sibling tools. Usage is implied rather than directed.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources