Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The tool is a preparatory, non-destructive step, and the description covers all necessary context: the verification process, the output (policy, deadline, URL), the non-estimation of charges, the non-cancellation behavior, the required guest action, and how to confirm actual cancellation via a later status lookup. With an output schema present, return values need no further explanation.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.