Skip to main content
Glama

squirrelscan

by com.squirrelscan

Create an API key

create_api_key

Mint a new squirrelscan API key for this organization (requires credentials carrying the keys:write scope, which OAuth sign-in grants). The key is returned EXACTLY ONCE: show it to the user immediately and suggest saving it as the SQUIRRELSCAN_API_KEY environment variable for the CLI, CI, and MCP. Minted keys cannot themselves mint keys.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
nameYesHuman-readable label shown in the dashboard, e.g. "ci" or "claude-code".
scopesNoScopes to grant (default: audits:write, audits:read, credits:read, org:read). Grantable: audits:write, audits:read, credits:read, org:read, org:write.
expires_in_daysNoExpire the key after this many days (default: never expires).

TDQS

A4.5/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Discloses key returned exactly once, scope requirement, and inheritance restriction. This adds significant behavioral context beyond annotations (readOnlyHint=false, destructiveHint=false). No contradiction.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences clearly structured: purpose, important note, restriction. No wasted words, front-loaded with action.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Adequately explains the one-time return behavior, but lacks explicit output schema or format details for the returned key. Minor gap for a creation tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, but description adds value with examples for name, defaults and list for scopes, and default behavior for expires_in_days. Exceeds baseline of 3.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly specifies 'Mint a new squirrelscan API key for this organization' with a distinct verb and resource. No sibling tool creates API keys, so it is well-distinguished.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides context on required scope (keys:write), OAuth, and immediate action (show user, suggest env var). Also notes that minted keys cannot mint keys. Does not explicitly state when not to use, but no alternative exists among siblings.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All squirrelscan toolsInspect
Try in Browser
RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4.4/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

Each tool maps to a distinct resource-action pair: websites, audits, issues, rules, credits, notifications, and account info are cleanly separated. Even the close pairs (delete_website vs delete_websites, get_rule vs list_rules) are clear singular/bulk or fetch-all vs fetch-one distinctions.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tool names follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern: add_, delete_, get_, list_, run_, comment_, send_, create_. The only outlier, whoami, is a conventional standalone command and does not break the overall predictability.

Tool Count4/5

At 20 tools, the surface is slightly heavy, but the count is justified by the wide domain coverage: audit lifecycle, issue tracking, rule catalog, billing/credits, notifications, and account management. Each tool appears to earn its place, and none feel redundant.

Completeness4/5

The core workflow is well covered: run an audit, poll it, fetch a report, compare audits, list and comment on issues, browse rules, and manage websites. Minor gaps exist—no cancel-audit tool, no update_website, and issues cannot be status-changed—but agents can work around these using the existing tools.

Resources