Skip to main content
Glama

List favourites

list_favorites
Read-onlyIdempotent

List the caller's favourites folders (name, entity_type, item_count). Pass entity_type (creo/webmaster/ad/hub/shop) to filter; omit it to list folders across all types. Pass folder (a folder name) to instead return the ITEMS inside that folder: entity ids for creo/webmaster/ad (usable with get_creative / get_webmaster / get_ad), resolved hub profiles (hub + id + label) for hub folders, and domains for shop folders. Use this to confirm what add_to_favorites saved and to read a folder back. FREE — does not consume quota.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
folderNoOPTIONAL folder name; when set, returns the ITEMS inside that folder (ids for creo/webmaster/ad — usable with get_creative/get_webmaster; resolved hub profiles for hub folders; domains for shop folders) instead of the folder list. If a name matches folders of several types, pass entity_type to disambiguate
entity_typeNooptional filter: creo, webmaster, ad, hub or shop; omit to list folders of all types

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
errorNoPresent only when isError is true: machine-readable failure. The human explanation stays in content.
paramsNoRequest parameter echo: applied = parameters that shaped this result; normalized = parameters rewritten before applying (alias, type coercion, resolved id); ignored = parameters that were accepted but NOT applied, with the reason.
foldersNo
folder_contentsNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • addedOutput schema / properties / error
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Present only when isError is true: machine-readable failure. The human explanation stays in content.",
      +  "properties": {
      +    "code": {
      +      "description": "fine-grained, stable failure code (e.g. invalid_arguments, backend_busy)",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "kind": {
      +      "description": "failure class: invalid_argument, not_found, permission_denied, unauthenticated, quota_exceeded, rate_limited, temporarily_unavailable, unavailable_until_ready, unsupported, internal",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "message": {
      +      "description": "the same human text as content[0]",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "outcome": {
      +      "description": "activity-feed outcome class",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "param": {
      +      "description": "the request parameter the failure is about, when known",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "retry_after_seconds": {
      +      "description": "wait this long before retrying",
      +      "type": "integer"
      +    },
      +    "retryable": {
      +      "description": "true when repeating the SAME call can succeed (after retry_after_seconds when present)",
      +      "type": "boolean"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / params
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Request parameter echo: applied = parameters that shaped this result; normalized = parameters rewritten before applying (alias, type coercion, resolved id); ignored = parameters that were accepted but NOT applied, with the reason.",
      +  "properties": {
      +    "applied": {
      +      "items": {
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "type": "array"
      +    },
      +    "ignored": {
      +      "items": {
      +        "properties": {
      +          "param": {
      +            "type": "string"
      +          },
      +          "reason": {
      +            "type": "string"
      +          },
      +          "to": {
      +            "description": "the parameter it was applied as, when renamed",
      +            "type": "string"
      +          },
      +          "value": {
      +            "description": "the value actually applied, when rewritten",
      +            "type": "string"
      +          }
      +        },
      +        "type": "object"
      +      },
      +      "type": "array"
      +    },
      +    "normalized": {
      +      "items": {
      +        "properties": {
      +          "param": {
      +            "type": "string"
      +          },
      +          "reason": {
      +            "type": "string"
      +          },
      +          "to": {
      +            "description": "the parameter it was applied as, when renamed",
      +            "type": "string"
      +          },
      +          "value": {
      +            "description": "the value actually applied, when rewritten",
      +            "type": "string"
      +          }
      +        },
      +        "type": "object"
      +      },
      +      "type": "array"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  2. First observed

TDQS

A4.9/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Beyond the readOnly/idempotent/non-destructive annotations, the description discloses the dual behavior (folder list vs. contained items), per-type return shapes (entity ids, hub profiles, domains), and the fact that the operation is free and does not consume quota. This is substantive behavioral context, not just a restatement of annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three sentences deliver the core behavior, filter option, item-mode behavior with return types, sibling connection, and quota note. Every sentence earns its place, and the most important scoping information is front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With an output schema present and full parameter schema coverage, the description only needs to add the non-obvious integration details, which it does. It covers both call modes, return shapes, the relationship to add_to_favorites, and the quota behavior, leaving no material gap for an agent to call this correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3, but the description adds meaning beyond the schema: it names get_ad alongside get_creative/get_webmaster as consumers of returned IDs and specifies that hub folder items are 'resolved hub profiles (hub + id + label)'. This helps an agent understand what values to expect and how to use them, though the schema already covers the core mode distinction.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description names the exact resource ('the caller's favourites folders') and a specific verb ('List'), then immediately clarifies the two operating modes: folder listing with optional entity_type filter, or items inside a named folder. It clearly differentiates from siblings like add_to_favorites and the get_* tools by explaining what it returns versus what those tools do.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly says 'Use this to confirm what add_to_favorites saved and to read a folder back,' giving a concrete use case tied to a sibling tool. It also routes item-level results onward to get_creative/get_webmaster/get_ad, so an agent knows when to use this listing tool versus when to follow up with a getter.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.