Skip to main content
Glama

Find similar webmasters

find_similar_webmasters
Read-only

Find other webmasters sharing normalized URL-parameter values with a source webmaster. First call get_webmaster_similarity_facets, then pass one returned param_key; optionally narrow to selected values. similarity_basis is url_parameter_overlap and rarity_count shows how many webmasters share the value. Results are deterministically ordered and bounded by the canonical source cap of 5000; result_status/result_cap/total_status state whether that bounded set is complete. QUOTA: 1 token per delivered row (default page 20).

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
limitNomaximum rows to return (default 20, maximum 200; 1 token per delivered row)
offsetNozero-based deterministic result offset
valuesNooptional subset of normalized source values for this param_key
param_keyYesURL parameter key returned by get_webmaster_similarity_facets
webmaster_idYessource webmaster UUID from search_webmasters

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dataNo
errorNoPresent only when isError is true: machine-readable failure. The human explanation stays in content.
limitNo
offsetNo
paramsNoRequest parameter echo: applied = parameters that shaped this result; normalized = parameters rewritten before applying (alias, type coercion, resolved id); ignored = parameters that were accepted but NOT applied, with the reason.
has_moreNo
param_keyNo
result_capNo
total_statusNo
result_statusNo
similarity_basisNo
source_webmaster_idNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed3 schema fields changed
    • addedOutput schema / properties / error
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Present only when isError is true: machine-readable failure. The human explanation stays in content.",
      +  "properties": {
      +    "code": {
      +      "description": "fine-grained, stable failure code (e.g. invalid_arguments, backend_busy)",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "kind": {
      +      "description": "failure class: invalid_argument, not_found, permission_denied, unauthenticated, quota_exceeded, rate_limited, temporarily_unavailable, unavailable_until_ready, unsupported, internal",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "message": {
      +      "description": "the same human text as content[0]",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "outcome": {
      +      "description": "activity-feed outcome class",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "param": {
      +      "description": "the request parameter the failure is about, when known",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "retry_after_seconds": {
      +      "description": "wait this long before retrying",
      +      "type": "integer"
      +    },
      +    "retryable": {
      +      "description": "true when repeating the SAME call can succeed (after retry_after_seconds when present)",
      +      "type": "boolean"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / params
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Request parameter echo: applied = parameters that shaped this result; normalized = parameters rewritten before applying (alias, type coercion, resolved id); ignored = parameters that were accepted but NOT applied, with the reason.",
      +  "properties": {
      +    "applied": {
      +      "items": {
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "type": "array"
      +    },
      +    "ignored": {
      +      "items": {
      +        "properties": {
      +          "param": {
      +            "type": "string"
      +          },
      +          "reason": {
      +            "type": "string"
      +          },
      +          "to": {
      +            "description": "the parameter it was applied as, when renamed",
      +            "type": "string"
      +          },
      +          "value": {
      +            "description": "the value actually applied, when rewritten",
      +            "type": "string"
      +          }
      +        },
      +        "type": "object"
      +      },
      +      "type": "array"
      +    },
      +    "normalized": {
      +      "items": {
      +        "properties": {
      +          "param": {
      +            "type": "string"
      +          },
      +          "reason": {
      +            "type": "string"
      +          },
      +          "to": {
      +            "description": "the parameter it was applied as, when renamed",
      +            "type": "string"
      +          },
      +          "value": {
      +            "description": "the value actually applied, when rewritten",
      +            "type": "string"
      +          }
      +        },
      +        "type": "object"
      +      },
      +      "type": "array"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • removedOutput schema / required
      Removed value: -[
      -  "source_webmaster_id",
      -  "similarity_basis",
      -  "param_key",
      -  "data",
      -  "offset",
      -  "limit",
      -  "has_more",
      -  "result_status",
      -  "result_cap",
      -  "total_status"
      -]
  2. First observed

TDQS

A4.5/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate read-only and non-destructive behavior, and the description adds substantial operational context beyond that: deterministic ordering, the 5000-row canonical cap, result_status/result_cap/total_status for completeness, and the token quota. No contradiction with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Purpose is front-loaded in the first sentence, followed by compact, high-signal operational details. Every sentence carries a distinct fact with no filler or redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Covers the prerequisite call, optional narrowing, deterministic ordering, bounded result semantics, status fields, and quota. An output schema exists, so return structure does not need to be spelled out. Nothing needed for correct invocation is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents all parameters. The description reinforces param_key provenance and the optional values subset, but does not add materially new parameter-level meaning beyond what the schema provides. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb ('find'), a specific resource ('other webmasters'), and a precise matching basis ('sharing normalized URL-parameter values'). Clearly differentiates from sibling tools like find_similar_ads and find_similar_creatives by targeting webmasters. Also names the prerequisite facet call, tying the purpose to the correct workflow.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides explicit call sequencing: first call get_webmaster_similarity_facets, then pass one returned param_key. Explains optional narrowing via selected values and the similarity basis. Does not explicitly state when not to use this tool versus find_similar_ads/find_similar_creatives, but the sibling names make the alternative obvious.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.