Skip to main content
Glama

SPLIDIA — operational notes and capabilities

by com.splidia

CSIDIA group services and profile

capabilities

Profilo del gruppo CSIDIA e catalogo dei servizi: chi siamo, posizionamento, capacità (cosa facciamo, risultati, settori, modelli di erogazione, pagina, articoli correlati), settori, vincoli e come iniziare. csidia = dati/AI/conformità, splidia = fibra ottica/reti/data center. / Profile of the CSIDIA group and its service catalogue: positioning, capabilities, sectors, delivery models, constraints and how to start.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
siteNoMarchio di cui restituire il profilo (default all) / brand to profile
detailNofalse (default) = una riga per capacità, risposta compatta; true = descrizione completa, risultati, domande tipiche e articoli correlati / false (default) = one line per capability; true = full detail
languageNoLingua dei testi (default it) / text language
capability_idNoDettaglio di una sola capacità, per id (es. 'conformita-documentale-assistita') / detail for a single capability id

TDQS

B3.1/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It does not state whether the operation is read-only, destructive, or requires authentication, nor does it mention any side effects or rate limits. The description only lists content categories.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two concise sentences covering both Italian and English, with no unnecessary words. It front-loads the purpose and key differentiators, making it efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description lists content topics (positioning, capabilities, sectors) but does not specify the output structure or format, which is important given no output schema. Behavioral context is missing, but the parameter details are adequate.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

All parameters have descriptions in the schema (100% coverage), so the description adds limited extra value. It does clarify that 'site' distinguishes brands and 'detail' controls response verbosity, but these align with schema descriptions. Baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it returns the profile of the CSIDIA group and service catalogue, including capabilities, sectors, and constraints. It differentiates between csidia and splidia, but the verb is implicit rather than explicit, preventing a top score.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus siblings like 'fetch' or 'search'. The description distinguishes internal brand options but does not address alternative tools, leaving usage context unclear.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All SPLIDIA — operational notes and capabilities toolsInspect
Try in Browser
RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: capabilities provides a static overview, fetch retrieves full articles, match_use_case maps needs to capabilities, and search finds articles. No overlap in functionality.

Naming Consistency3/5

Tool names mix parts of speech and styles: 'capabilities' (noun), 'fetch' (bare verb), 'match_use_case' (verb_noun with underscore), 'search' (bare verb). While each is clear, there is no consistent naming pattern.

Tool Count5/5

Four tools is well-scoped for the server's purpose—providing a service catalogue and searchable operational notes. Each tool earns its place without unnecessary excess or glaring omissions.

Completeness5/5

The tool surface covers the full lifecycle for the intended use: viewing the profile, searching articles, fetching full text, and matching use cases. No obvious gaps for a static catalogue and search system.

Resources