Skip to main content
Glama

SPACEXPLORATION

Search Listings Tool

search_listings
Read-only

Search commercial real estate listings. Returns paginated hits with facet counts. For AI-driven search, call interpret_search first to convert a natural-language query into structured filters, then pass those filters — and its bounds, when present — here.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
pageNoPage number (1-based). Defaults to 1.
sortNoSort key. Valid values from get_registry sort_options (e.g. "listed_at:desc", "price:asc").
queryNoFree-text search query (street address, city, or keyword). Omit or pass null for no text filter.
boundsNoGeographic bounding box (degrees) limiting hits to an area. Forward the bounds returned by interpret_search verbatim to honour "near <place>" intent; omit for a nationwide search.
filtersNoStructured filter map keyed by Typesense field name. Ranges as {min?, max?}, multi-select as string[], booleans as true/false. Call get_registry to see valid field names and allowed values.

TDQS

A4.7/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations declare readOnlyHint=true, which is consistent. The description adds that results are paginated and include facet counts, providing useful behavioral context beyond the annotation alone.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two tightly-written sentences with no wasted words. First sentence states purpose and key features; second provides essential usage guidance. Front-loaded and efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 5 parameters, no output schema, and moderate complexity, the description is fully adequate. It covers functionality, pagination, facets, and integration with interpret_search and get_registry. No missing information needed for correct use.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema covers all 5 parameters (100% coverage). Description adds value by explaining how to use bounds (forward from interpret_search) and filters (consult get_registry), which goes beyond the schema descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the tool searches commercial real estate listings and returns paginated hits with facet counts. It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like interpret_search (which converts natural language to filters) and get_registry (which provides valid fields).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly instructs to call interpret_search first for AI-driven search, then pass its output filters and bounds here. This provides clear when-to-use guidance and differentiates from alternative workflows.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.9/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: listing CRUD, attachment upload workflow, search with interpret, geocoding, saved searches, and registry retrieval. No two tools overlap significantly; even the upload-related tools (sign, confirm, attach) are sequential and distinct.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., create_listing, get_registry, search_listings). The naming is predictable and clear, with no mixing of conventions.

Tool Count5/5

With 15 tools, the server covers the core functionalities of a commercial real estate listing system without being bloated. Each tool serves a necessary role, and the count feels well-scoped for the domain.

Completeness2/5

The tool set is missing critical lifecycle operations: there is no way to delete or archive a listing, nor any tool to publish/unpublish a listing. This leaves an obvious gap in the basic CRUD workflow, which will cause agent failures when users need to remove or finalize listings.

Resources