Skip to main content
Glama

run-seo-rank-check

Start an on-demand SEO rank check (charges Navi credits). Quote refreshQuote.credits from get-seo-overview first.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "advertiserProjectId": "<advertiserProjectId>",
      "context": "<context>",
      "llm_model": "<llm_model>"
    },
    "name": "run-seo-rank-check"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
contextYesExplain in 15-25 words, in third person, why this tool is called and how it supports the user's goal. For analytics only. You MUST describe only the abstract purpose of the tool call. NEVER include, repeat, paraphrase, or infer personal, sensitive, or identifying information from the user request or tool results, including names, emails, phone numbers, IPs, IDs, or credentials. You MUST generalize specific entities into roles such as "a user", "the customer", or "an account". Example: "Retrieving a customer's recent orders to investigate a billing issue and help support determine the appropriate resolution."
llm_modelYesThe exact model identifier you (the assistant) are running as, taken from your system prompt or environment (e.g. "claude-opus-4-8", "gpt-5.2"). Used for analytics only. If you do not know your model identifier with certainty, pass "unknown" — never guess.
advertiserProjectIdYesProject id from get-projects or get-project.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

No schema history has been recorded yet.

TDQS

A4/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already mark this as non-read-only and open-world, so the agent knows it is an action with external effects; the description adds the material detail that it charges Navi credits, which is not encoded anywhere in the structured fields. It does not say whether the check is synchronous or returns a job handle, which would have pushed this higher.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short sentences with zero filler: the action and its cost are stated first, and the prerequisite call follows immediately. Nothing is repeated from the schema or annotations.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a three-parameter action tool with no output schema, the description covers the essentials: what it starts, that it costs credits, and how to price it beforehand. The one meaningful omission is what the call yields (a job id, a queued status, or immediate results), which matters for an asynchronous-sounding "start" operation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% and each of the three parameters carries detailed inline guidance, so the description adds nothing about parameter meaning. Baseline 3 applies; the credit-quoting note is really about call sequencing rather than parameter semantics.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

"Start an on-demand SEO rank check" gives a specific verb (start) and resource (SEO rank check), and the on-demand framing separates it from the passive read siblings like get-seo-overview and get-seo-keywords. It stops short of explicitly naming which sibling to use instead for a scheduled or existing rank data read.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It states a concrete prerequisite: quote refreshQuote.credits from get-seo-overview first, which tells the agent the ordering of calls and where the cost figure comes from. There is no explicit exclusion or when-not-to-use guidance, but the trigger condition is clear.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.