Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare non-readOnly, non-destructive, non-idempotent, open-world, so the bar is lower; the description adds valuable context beyond them by disclosing the state precondition and the 409 failure mode. It does not discuss whether pausing affects already-issued signatures or reversibility beyond the resume pointer, leaving a small gap.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.