Skip to main content
Glama

Scribe Mail

List signatures

list_signatures
Read-onlyIdempotent

List the workspace's email-signature templates. A Scribe 'signature' is a reusable template (the layout that gets deployed to teammates' mail clients); v1 returns the workspace's primary templates. Paginated (page/limit). The large content/draft_content block trees are omitted by default — pass include_content:true to fetch them.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
pageNo1-based page (default 1).
limitNoPage size, 1–100 (default 50).
contextYesExplain in 15-25 words, in third person, why this tool is called and how it supports the user's goal. For analytics only. You MUST describe only the abstract purpose of the tool call. NEVER include, repeat, paraphrase, or infer personal, sensitive, or identifying information from the user request or tool results, including names, emails, phone numbers, IPs, IDs, or credentials. You MUST generalize specific entities into roles such as "a user", "the customer", or "an account". Example: "Retrieving a customer's recent orders to investigate a billing issue and help support determine the appropriate resolution."
max_pagesNoPage cap when auto_paginate is true (default 5).
auto_paginateNoFetch multiple pages up to `max_pages` (default false).
include_contentNoInclude the full `content`/`draft_content` block trees. Default false: they are omitted to save tokens, but `has_content`/`has_draft_content` still tell you whether each exists.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dataYes
truncatedYesTrue when auto_paginate stopped at max_pages with more results remaining.
paginationYes
pages_fetchedYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed8 schema fields changed
    • removedOutput schema / properties / data / items / properties / folder_id / anyOf
      Removed value: -[
      -  {
      -    "type": "string"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "type": "null"
      -  }
      -]
    • addedOutput schema / properties / data / items / properties / folder_id / type
      Added value: +[
      +  "string",
      +  "null"
      +]
    • removedOutput schema / properties / data / items / properties / last_published_at / anyOf
      Removed value: -[
      -  {
      -    "type": "string"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "type": "null"
      -  }
      -]
    • addedOutput schema / properties / data / items / properties / last_published_at / type
      Added value: +[
      +  "string",
      +  "null"
      +]
    • removedOutput schema / properties / data / items / properties / name / anyOf
      Removed value: -[
      -  {
      -    "type": "string"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "type": "null"
      -  }
      -]
    • addedOutput schema / properties / data / items / properties / name / type
      Added value: +[
      +  "string",
      +  "null"
      +]
    • removedOutput schema / properties / data / items / properties / priority / anyOf
      Removed value: -[
      -  {
      -    "type": "number"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "type": "null"
      -  }
      -]
    • addedOutput schema / properties / data / items / properties / priority / type
      Added value: +[
      +  "number",
      +  "null"
      +]
  2. First observed

TDQS

A3.9/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnly, idempotent, non-destructive, so the safety profile is free. The description adds genuinely useful non-annotation behavior: large content trees are stripped by default to save tokens and has_content/has_draft_content still report existence. It also flags the v1 scope limit, but says nothing about the openWorld/workspace-scoping implication of the annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Four sentences, each doing distinct work: definition, domain disambiguation, pagination scope, and the token-saving default. The most decision-relevant constraint (content omitted by default) is stated before the call and nothing is repeated from the schema verbatim.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With an output schema present, return values need no prose, and the description covers scope, pagination, and the content-omission default. The remaining gap is routing among the many neighbor list_* tools (variants, recipients, installations) and the required context parameter, both of which an agent must reason about unaided.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3, and the description earns an extra point by explaining the tradeoff behind include_content (token cost vs. full block trees) and by surfacing page/limit pagination semantics. auto_paginate and max_pages are left entirely to the schema, and the required context parameter is unmentioned.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ("List the workspace's email-signature templates") and disambiguates the overloaded term "signature" as a reusable deployment template, which distinguishes it from email/asset concepts. It does not explicitly name the near siblings (list_signature_variants, get_signature_html), so an agent still has to infer which signature-* list to pick.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives a concrete conditional: content blocks are omitted by default, and you should pass include_content:true to fetch them, with has_content flags left as a cheap alternative. Pagination behavior is also stated. It stops short of naming alternatives for scenario-based routing (e.g. variants vs primary templates), so it is clear context rather than full when/when-not guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.