Skip to main content
Glama

List error issues

errors.list
Read-onlyIdempotent

Errors from the app on this branch, grouped into issues, with usage and the DSN to put in the Sentry SDK. Turn the slot on with capabilities.add slot errors. Scope: logs:read.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "errors.list"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
branchNoBranch (environment) id. Optional: defaults to `production`.
project_idNoProject id. Optional: defaults to the project created or used last in this session, or the only one.
organization_idNoOrganization id. Optional: defaults to the token's organization, or the only one you belong to.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A4/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint and destructiveHint=false, so the safety profile is covered by structured data. The description adds genuinely new context beyond that: the required capability slot, the logs:read scope, and that results are pre-grouped into issues with usage stats and a DSN. It stops short of describing pagination or result limits.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three tight sentences with zero filler: what the data is first, the enabling step second, the permission scope last. Every sentence adds information an agent would otherwise have to discover by failure.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a read-only list tool with three optional, fully documented parameters and no output schema, the description tells the agent what comes back (grouped issues, usage, DSN) and what gates access. Only the handling of large result sets is unaddressed, which is a minor gap.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so branch, project_id and organization_id defaults are fully documented in the schema itself. The phrase 'on this branch' loosely reinforces the branch parameter's role as an environment selector, but adds no format or syntax detail beyond the schema. Baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific resource (app errors grouped into issues on this branch) and its payload (usage counts plus the DSN for the Sentry SDK). An agent can distinguish it from errors.get by the plural grouping, though the description never explicitly contrasts with that sibling — the name carries that differentiation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives a concrete prerequisite: the slot must be enabled via capabilities.add slot errors. That is real when-to-use guidance with an actionable step, but it offers no exclusions or routing to errors.get for detail.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources