Contacto
contact_infoDatos de contacto del refugio (email, WhatsApp, Instagram).
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
contact_infoDatos de contacto del refugio (email, WhatsApp, Instagram).
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description adds no behavioral insight beyond what annotations (readOnlyHint: true) already convey. It merely restates the tool's purpose without detailing any side effects or constraints.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
A single, efficient sentence conveys all necessary information without unnecessary words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's simplicity (no parameters, no output schema, static data), the description fully covers what the agent needs to know.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
With zero parameters, schema coverage is 100%. The description does not need to add parameter meaning, earning a baseline 4.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Datos de contacto del refugio (email, WhatsApp, Instagram)' clearly states the tool provides contact information, distinguishing it from sibling tools like 'check_availability' or 'get_price'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies usage for retrieving contact data but provides no explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use guidance, nor references alternative tools.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.