Skip to main content
Glama

SameDayDesk agent tools

track_taskmarket_task

Read-only

Track one public TaskMarket task through the official read API. Returns status, deadline, submissions, artifact hashes, canonical awards, pending actions, and the next authorization boundary. It cannot create, accept, reject, rate, or refund work.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "task_id": "<task_id>"
    },
    "name": "track_taskmarket_task"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
task_idYesTaskMarket 32-byte task id.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A4.3/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and destructiveHint=false, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds useful context by listing returned fields, including 'next authorization boundary', and by explicitly reinforcing the non-mutating scope with a list of actions it cannot perform.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two tightly written sentences with no filler. The primary action is front-loaded, followed by a useful enumeration of returned data and a clear boundary statement.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a single-parameter, read-only tool with no output schema, the description covers purpose, access mode, output contents, and non-capabilities. Annotations carry the safety profile, and the schema carries the parameter format, so nothing critical is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, and the only parameter (task_id) is fully documented with a pattern. The description adds no format or validation details beyond what the schema already provides, so baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb (track), resource (TaskMarket task), scope (one public task), and access mode (official read API). The singular 'one public TaskMarket task' distinguishes it from the plural sibling browse_taskmarket_tasks without needing to inspect either schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives clear context for when to use it: tracking a single public TaskMarket task through the official read API. It also explicitly rules out mutation actions (create, accept, reject, rate, refund), but does not name an alternative sibling tool to use for discovery or delegation.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.