topup_balance
Top up agent balance. rail: usdc (x402) or rub (YooKassa). Returns pay_url to complete payment.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| rail | No | usdc | |
| No | agent@domains-for-ai.app | ||
| agent_id | Yes | ||
| amount_minor | Yes |
Top up agent balance. rail: usdc (x402) or rub (YooKassa). Returns pay_url to complete payment.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| rail | No | usdc | |
| No | agent@domains-for-ai.app | ||
| agent_id | Yes | ||
| amount_minor | Yes |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided. Description discloses return value (pay_url) and payment rails, but lacks details on authorization, side effects, or failure modes.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two concise sentences, front-loaded with the core action and then key details. No wasted words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Adequate for a simple operation, explains purpose and return value, but lacks parameter details for email and amount_minor, and no output schema.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 0%. Description only adds meaning to 'rail' (usdc or rub), ignoring email, agent_id, and amount_minor parameters.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states 'Top up agent balance' using a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from sibling tools like check_balance which is read-only.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, no exclusions or prerequisites mentioned.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.