Skip to main content
Glama

Vedic Astrology and Kundli MCP Server by RoxyAPI

Get Hora - 24 Planetary Hours (12 day + 12 night)

post_vedic_astrology_panchang_hora
Read-only

Calculate all 24 Hora (planetary hour) periods for any date and location. Day is divided into 12 equal horas from sunrise to sunset, night into 12 equal horas from sunset to next sunrise. Each hora is ruled by a planet in the Chaldean sequence starting from the day lord. Hora timings API, planetary hours calculator, Vedic hora chart, electional astrology timing.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dateYesDate in YYYY-MM-DD format. A single-digit month or day is accepted and zero-padded (2026-3-5 becomes 2026-03-05). Impossible calendar dates are rejected.
compactNoSet true for the same data in a compact shape: arrays of same-shaped objects arrive columnar as {"__cols":[names],"__rows":[[values]]}. Lossless, typically 40 to 52 percent fewer tokens.
latitudeYesObserver latitude in decimal degrees. Determines sunrise and sunset times which define day/night boundaries for muhurta calculations.
timezoneNoTimezone offset from UTC in decimal hours. Used for accurate sunrise/sunset calculation and output time formatting. Essential for correct Hora periods outside IST. Defaults to 5.5 (IST).
longitudeYesObserver longitude in decimal degrees. Affects local time calculations for sunrise, sunset, and muhurta period boundaries.

TDQS

A3.6/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and destructiveHint=false, covering safety. The description adds context about the calculation methodology (12 equal horas from sunrise to sunset, Chaldean sequence), but it does not disclose output format or edge cases such as polar regions where sunrise/sunset may be undefined.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is compact at three sentences and front-loads the primary purpose. However, the final sentence lists redundant keywords ('Hora timings API, planetary hours calculator...') that add little value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a calculation tool with no output schema, the description explains the concept well but fails to indicate the response structure (e.g., whether start times, planet names are returned). Since there is no output schema, this gap makes it incomplete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

All 5 parameters already have thorough descriptions in the schema (100% coverage), giving the baseline of 3. The main description adds no parameter-specific semantics beyond what the schema already provides.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Calculate all 24 Hora (planetary hour) periods for any date and location,' identifying the specific verb, resource, and scope. It distinguishes this tool from sibling panchang tools by focusing specifically on planetary hours with detailed day/night division.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description does not explicitly compare this to sibling tools like post_vedic_astrology_panchang_choghadiya or panchang_basic. While the focus on Hora hours implies electional use, there is no explicit 'use when' or 'use instead' guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.6/5.0
Disambiguation3/5

Many tools have overlapping concepts (multiple dasha levels, monthly variants, aspects, transit), but detailed descriptions clarify each one's distinct purpose. Still, a few pairs like planetary_positions vs birth_chart or aspects_monthly vs aspects_lunar could confuse an agent initially.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tools follow a strict get_vedic_astrology_* or post_vedic_astrology_* prefix with snake_case resource names. The pattern is predictable and uniformly applied, including the hierarchical dasha drill-downs, making it easy to infer tool families.

Tool Count1/5

With 50 tools, the server is extremely heavy. Many are monthly, interval, or sub-level variants that could be parameterized or consolidated, making the set feel bloated and difficult to navigate for an agent.

Completeness5/5

The tool set covers nearly the entire Vedic astrology domain: reference data (nakshatras, rashis, yoga glossary), core charts (birth, navamsa, divisional), dasha hierarchy, transits, compatibility, doshas, panchang, KP system, and advanced calculations like Shadbala and Ashtakavarga. No significant gaps are apparent.

Resources