Skip to main content
Glama

Vedic Astrology and Kundli MCP Server by RoxyAPI

Get KP ruling planets with significators at intervals

post_vedic_astrology_kp_ruling_planets_interval
Read-only

Calculate ruling planets and their KP significators at regular time intervals using Krishnamurti Paddhati prashna (horary) astrology. For each interval, a full Placidus house chart is erected and significators are computed using the 4-level KP hierarchy: Level 1 (strongest) planets in star of house occupant, Level 2 occupants, Level 3 planets in star of house owner, Level 4 house owner. Returns Day Lord (sunrise-based Hindu Vara), Moon Sign/Star/Sub/Sub-Sub Lords, Lagna Sign/Star/Sub/Sub-Sub Lords, unique ruling planets set, and per-ruling-planet house significations. No birth data needed, significators come from each moments sky chart. Use for birth time rectification, muhurta selection, and KP horary number analysis.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
langNoResponse language (BCP 47). Supported: en, tr, de, es, hi, pt, fr, ru, zh-Hans, zh-Hant. Defaults to en. Coverage varies by domain, and a field with no translation in the requested language returns English.en
focusNoWhich signification vocabulary the houseThemes map returns. "general" gives the classical bhava significations (self, wealth, siblings, home, and so on). "finance" gives the money reading of the same twelve bhavas, so house 2 returns income and savings, 5 speculation and risk appetite, 8 sudden money and leverage, 11 gains and profits, and 12 expenses and capital outflow. Use "finance" for wealth, income, business and market timing questions in Krishnamurti Paddhati, where the significator house groups 2, 6, 10, 11 for earned income and 5, 8, 11 for speculation are read against a running dasha. Defaults to "general".general
compactNoSet true for the same data in a compact shape: arrays of same-shaped objects arrive columnar as {"__cols":[names],"__rows":[[values]]}. Lossless, typically 40 to 52 percent fewer tokens.
ayanamsaNoAyanamsa system for sidereal conversion. "kp-newcomb" uses the KP-Newcomb dynamic formula, the most common choice for KP astrology. "kp-old" uses the Krishnamurti original table from KP Reader-1 with constant precession rate. "lahiri" uses Lahiri/Chitrapaksha ayanamsa, matching most traditional Vedic software. "raman" uses the B.V. Raman ayanamsa from Hindu Predictive Astrology, a recognised traditional school that sits about 1.45 degrees below Lahiri. Defaults to "kp-newcomb".kp-newcomb
latitudeYesObserver latitude in decimal degrees
nodeTypeNoLunar node convention. "mean" is the smoothed average node, which always moves retrograde; "true" is the osculating node, which tracks the real perturbed node, oscillates up to about 1.5 degrees either side of the mean on a 173-day cycle, and can briefly turn direct. Neither is more correct and they almost always fall in the same sign. Applies to the Rahu and Ketu positions. Mean is the traditional Vedic default and what printed panchangs use; the choice can move a KP sub-lord in narrow boundary cases, where a span can be as small as 0.5 degrees. Defaults to "mean".mean
timezoneNoTimezone offset from UTC in decimal hours. When non-zero, all datetimes are treated as local time in this timezone (Z suffix is ignored). Output times are also converted to this timezone. Defaults to 5.5 (IST).
longitudeYesObserver longitude in decimal degrees
endDatetimeYesEnd of the interval range in ISO 8601 (YYYY-MM-DDTHH:MM:SS). Interpreted as local time when a non-zero timezone is provided (a trailing Z is accepted but ignored); with timezone 0 it is UTC.
startDatetimeYesStart of the interval range in ISO 8601 (YYYY-MM-DDTHH:MM:SS). Interpreted as local time when a non-zero timezone is provided (a trailing Z is accepted but ignored); with timezone 0 it is UTC.
intervalMinutesYesInterval between calculations in minutes (1-1440). Use 1-5 for birth time rectification.

TDQS

A4.3/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and destructiveHint=false, lowering the burden. The description goes well beyond this by disclosing the methodology for each interval, the 4-level KP significator hierarchy, the specific lords returned, the absence of birth-data requirements, and that charts are erected from each moment's sky. This is rich behavioral disclosure beyond the structured annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a dense, multi-sentence block that packs methodological detail, output fields, and use cases. It is longer than average but every sentence carries real content for a complex tool; still, it could have been tightened slightly by trimming redundancies like the repeated emphasis on intervals.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the 11-parameter input schema and the absence of an output schema, the description compensates by explaining both the calculation method and what should appear in the response. It does not explicitly discuss performance implications of very short intervals over long ranges, but the provided details are sufficient for an agent to understand the operation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema documents every parameter thoroughly. The tool description adds domain context but repeats little of the schema parameter details, so the baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb-resource pair: 'Calculate ruling planets and their KP significators at regular time intervals'. It makes the interval-based nature central, which clearly separates it from the non-interval sibling kp_ruling_planets, and the additional KP 4-level hierarchy details remove ambiguity about what the tool actually computes.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly names use cases: birth time rectification, muhurta selection, and KP horary number analysis. It does not explicitly state when not to use this tool or point to the non-interval kp_ruling_planets alternative, so the guidance is strong but not fully exclusionary.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.6/5.0
Disambiguation3/5

Many tools have overlapping concepts (multiple dasha levels, monthly variants, aspects, transit), but detailed descriptions clarify each one's distinct purpose. Still, a few pairs like planetary_positions vs birth_chart or aspects_monthly vs aspects_lunar could confuse an agent initially.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tools follow a strict get_vedic_astrology_* or post_vedic_astrology_* prefix with snake_case resource names. The pattern is predictable and uniformly applied, including the hierarchical dasha drill-downs, making it easy to infer tool families.

Tool Count1/5

With 50 tools, the server is extremely heavy. Many are monthly, interval, or sub-level variants that could be parameterized or consolidated, making the set feel bloated and difficult to navigate for an agent.

Completeness5/5

The tool set covers nearly the entire Vedic astrology domain: reference data (nakshatras, rashis, yoga glossary), core charts (birth, navamsa, divisional), dasha hierarchy, transits, compatibility, doshas, panchang, KP system, and advanced calculations like Shadbala and Ashtakavarga. No significant gaps are apparent.

Resources