Skip to main content
Glama

Kabbalah MCP Server by RoxyAPI

Generate a birth profile - Hebrew birthday and birth angel API

post_kabbalah_birth_profile
Read-only

Return the Hebrew date of a birth, the Hebrew birthday that follows it, the three birth names of the Renaissance angel tradition and the sephirah of the birth day, from one birth moment. The Hebrew date is computed from the published calendar algorithm rather than looked up, the sunset boundary is a typed request field because it depends on where you were, and the two rival ways of dating the first name are a typed convention the response echoes. Built for Jewish culture and education apps, birth angel features and any product that wants the Hebrew birthday on the same key as the rest of its readings.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dateYesBirth date in YYYY-MM-DD, proleptic Gregorian. Dates before the 1582 reform are read on the same proleptic reckoning rather than switched to the Julian calendar.
langNoResponse language (BCP 47). Supported: en, tr, de, es, hi, pt, fr, ru, zh-Hans, zh-Hant. Defaults to en. Coverage varies by domain, and a field with no translation in the requested language returns English.en
timeNoBirth time in HH:MM:SS local to the timezone field. Defaults to noon when omitted, which is stated because the name read from the hour changes every twenty minutes and a defaulted time cannot be precise.
compactNoSet true for the same data in a compact shape: arrays of same-shaped objects arrive columnar as {"__cols":[names],"__rows":[[values]]}. Lossless, typically 40 to 52 percent fewer tokens.
timezoneYesIANA name (e.g. "America/New_York", "Europe/London", "UTC"), decimal hours (e.g. -5 for EST, 1 for CET), or a fixed UTC offset (e.g. "-05:00", "+01:00"). Prefer the IANA name: it is resolved to the DST-correct offset for the birth date, while a fixed offset or decimal is taken literally and will be wrong if it does not match the daylight-saving state on that date. Invalid timezones return 400 with a validation error.
yearStartNoWhich date the civil wheel of five day periods opens on. Both are conventions rather than facts: the equinox itself moves inside a window that covers both days, and it fell on 20 March in 2026. march-21 is the pinned published wheel and march-20 is that wheel shifted one day. Ignored when angelDating is solar-longitude.march-21
afterSunsetNoSet true when the moment falls after nightfall, which advances the Hebrew date by one day because the Hebrew day begins in the evening. It is a caller assertion rather than a computation, since sunset depends on a place and this conversion takes none.
angelDatingNoHow the name of the day is found. Use solar-longitude for the exact five degree arc the Sun stood in at the birth moment, or lenain-blocks for the fixed civil calendar of five day periods. The Sun does not move at a constant rate, so the two drift apart by up to about three days by early August and were never reconciled.solar-longitude
leapDayPolicyNoWhere 29 February falls. The civil wheel was built for a 365 day year and has no slot for it, so published tables differ: extend-previous reads the day as part of the period ending 28 February, next-angel reads it as the opening of the period starting 1 March. Ignored when angelDating is solar-longitude.extend-previous

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A4/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The annotations already signal readOnly=true and destructive false. The description adds genuine behavioral context: the Hebrew date is 'computed from the published calendar algorithm rather than looked up', the sunset boundary is a caller assertion rather than a computation, and the two dating conventions are explicitly called out as conventions the response echoes. This goes beyond the structured annotations without contradicting them.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three dense sentences each earn their place: the first lists what is returned, the second explains the two non-obvious design decisions, and the third names target audiences. It is front-loaded with the most important information and contains no filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with 9 parameters, 4 enums, and no output schema, the description does well: it enumerates the returned data, explains the calendar and dating conventions that could otherwise be confusing, and states the intended product contexts. It stops short of a 5 because there is no explicit mention of response shape or error behavior, though the rich schema and annotations cover most operational needs.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the input schema already documents all 9 parameters well. The description adds useful conceptual context about why afterSunset and angelDating are typed request fields, but it does not add new parameter-level syntax, constraints, or examples beyond what the schema already provides.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description opens with a specific verb and resource: 'Return the Hebrew date of a birth, the Hebrew birthday that follows it, the three birth names... and the sephirah of the birth day.' This precisely enumerates what the tool produces and clearly distinguishes it from siblings like post_kabbalah_name_profile by anchoring the output to a single birth moment and Hebrew birthday concepts.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives clear intended use cases: 'Built for Jewish culture and education apps, birth angel features and any product that wants the Hebrew birthday on the same key as the rest of its readings.' However, it never explicitly tells an agent when to choose this tool over a sibling or when not to use it, so usage remains implied rather than explicit.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Disambiguation4/5

Most tools are cleanly separated by resource and verb: collection/detail variants exist for letters and names, tree vs single sephirah is clear, and compute endpoints are distinct. The only meaningful overlap is post_kabbalah_gematria and post_kabbalah_name_profile, which both score a name across gematria ciphers and display candidate Hebrew spellings; the descriptions differentiate their outputs but an agent could easily select the wrong one.

Naming Consistency5/5

Every tool follows the same verb_kabbalah_resource pattern, with get_ for reference lookups and post_ for computations. snake_case is used throughout, and detail variants are marked consistently with _id or _number.

Tool Count5/5

Twelve tools is well within the ideal range and each tool covers a distinct area: catalogues, letters, names, sephirot/tree, daily Omer, and name calculations. The surface is broad enough to be useful without feeling inflated.

Completeness5/5

The API covers the core domain comprehensively: reference data for ciphers, letters, 72 names, sephirot/tree, dated Omer count, and the main name-scoring operations including compatibility. CRUD is not applicable for a read-only/compute server, and get_kabbalah_tree already provides collection-level sephirot data, so there are no obvious dead ends.

Resources