Skip to main content
Glama

Human Design MCP Server by RoxyAPI

Generate full Human Design bodygraph - Type, authority, profile, centers, channels, gates

post_human_design_bodygraph
Read-only

Generate a complete Human Design bodygraph from a birth date, time, and timezone. Returns the energy type, strategy, inner authority, signature, not-self theme, profile, definition, incarnation cross, all nine centers with defined state and active gates, the defined channels, and all 26 planetary activations across the Personality and Design sides. The single endpoint for a full chart in one call, built for Human Design apps, readings, and coaching tools.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dateYesBirth date in YYYY-MM-DD format. The anchor for both the Personality activations at birth and the Design activations 88 degrees of solar arc earlier.
langNoResponse language (BCP 47). Supported: en, tr, de, es, hi, pt, fr, ru, zh-Hans, zh-Hant. Defaults to en. Coverage varies by domain, and a field with no translation in the requested language returns English.en
timeYesBirth time in 24-hour HH:MM:SS format. Precision matters: the profile lines and gate boundaries shift with the exact minute of birth.
compactNoSet true for the same data in a compact shape: arrays of same-shaped objects arrive columnar as {"__cols":[names],"__rows":[[values]]}. Lossless, typically 40 to 52 percent fewer tokens.
latitudeNoBirth latitude in decimal degrees. Optional and does not affect the bodygraph, which depends only on ecliptic longitudes. Defaults to 0.
nodeTypeNoLunar node convention. "mean" is the smoothed average node, which always moves retrograde; "true" is the osculating node, which tracks the real perturbed node, oscillates up to about 1.5 degrees either side of the mean on a 173-day cycle, and can briefly turn direct. Neither is more correct and they almost always fall in the same sign. Applies to the North and South Node activations. True is what professional Human Design software uses (HumanDesign.ai, Total Human Design) and is the value RoxyAPI verifies against, so leave it unset for a standard chart. It matters only when a node sits on a gate boundary, where the choice moves a node gate. Because a gate can be half of a channel, that can change the completed channels and, with them, whether a center reads defined or open, plus the definition, authority, profile or type. A chart where only one center disagrees is the usual shape, since the type and profile often survive unchanged. If another calculator disagrees on any of those, it is almost certainly using the mean node: pass "mean" to match it. Defaults to "true".true
timezoneYesIANA name (e.g. "America/New_York", "Europe/London", "UTC"), decimal hours (e.g. -5 for EST, 1 for CET), or a fixed UTC offset (e.g. "-05:00", "+01:00"). Prefer the IANA name: it is resolved to the DST-correct offset for the birth date, while a fixed offset or decimal is taken literally and will be wrong if it does not match the daylight-saving state on that date. Invalid timezones return 400 with a validation error.
longitudeNoBirth longitude in decimal degrees. Optional and does not affect the bodygraph. Defaults to 0.

TDQS

A3.9/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint true and destructiveHint false, so safety characteristics are covered. The description adds that the operation returns a large, complete chart and is single-call, but it does not disclose behaviors beyond annotations (no pacing/rate-limit, size, or error behavior). The description is not contradictory, and covers the main safety profile via annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three sentences deliver scope, exact contents of the response, and ideal use case. It is not as razor-thin as possible, but every sentence is informative and the purpose is front-loaded; no filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the high parameters and no output schema, the description does the heavy lifting by listing output categories, including centers with defined state, active gates, channels, and all 26 planetary activations. Missing the exact response envelope or a note on response size, but for selecting and invoking this tool it provides enough context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The 8 parameters are each fully documented in the input schema (100% coverage), including format, examples, defaults, and caveats such as timezone handling and nodeType effects. The tool description only repeats 'birth date, time, and timezone' but adds no semantics beyond the schema; the baseline 3 is correct.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description opens with a specific verb and resource: 'Generate a complete Human Design bodygraph' and then enumerates every output area, from energy type and authority down to centers, channels, and all 26 planetary activations. The word 'complete' plus 'single endpoint for a full chart' clearly differentiates it from sibling tools that cover individual centers, gates, channels, or types.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description clearly tells the agent this is the endpoint for a full chart in one call, which is a usable selection signal. It does not explicitly name sibling tools or say when to prefer get_human/design_centersit, a clear context, but no explicit when-not-to-use boundary, so it is just below the best level.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.9/5.0
Disambiguation3/5

The static reference tools are clearly distinct, and connection, transit, and penta handle unique types of analysis. However, the full bodygraph endpoint already returns type, profile, centers, gates, and channels, so the component-specific calculation endpoints create moderate selection ambiguity.

Naming Consistency4/5

The tools follow a clear post_human_design_ / get_human_design_ pattern, with get_ reserved for reference lookups and post_ used for calculations. The pattern is slightly inconsistent because the two reference tools add _id and _number suffixes, while the calculation tools use plain plural resource names.

Tool Count4/5

Twelve tools is within a reasonable scope and covers the broad Human Design domain, including basic charts, transit, compatibility, and group analysis. The count is slightly higher than strictly necessary because several partial-looking endpoints duplicate the data already returned by the full bodygraph endpoint.

Completeness5/5

The server covers the full core chart generation flow, reference data for centers and gates, profile, type, variables, transit overlays, connection charts, and group connections. There are no obvious dead ends for Human Design apps and a reading or coaching workload seems well supported.

Resources