Skip to main content
Glama

Western Astrology MCP Server by RoxyAPI

Monthly Ephemeris - Daily tropical planetary positions for a month

post_astrology_planets_monthly
Read-only

Get daily tropical ecliptic positions for all 14 Western bodies (the 10 classical planets Sun through Pluto, the lunar nodes, Chiron, and Black Moon Lilith) for an entire month. Returns longitude, zodiac sign, degree within sign, and retrograde status for each body on each day, calculated at noon UTC. Omit year and month to get the month in progress, so a published ephemeris page stays current without a redeploy. Essential for ephemeris tables, transit tracking, retrograde calendars, and planetary movement charts. Monthly ephemeris API, tropical position table, daily planet transit positions, ecliptic longitude calculator. Verified against NASA JPL Horizons.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
langNoResponse language (BCP 47). Supported: en, tr, de, es, hi, pt, fr, ru, zh-Hans, zh-Hant. Defaults to en. Coverage varies by domain, and a field with no translation in the requested language returns English.en
yearNoYear for the monthly ephemeris (1900-2100). Defaults to the current year (UTC).
monthNoMonth number (1-12) for the ephemeris. Defaults to the current month (UTC).
compactNoSet true for the same data in a compact shape: arrays of same-shaped objects arrive columnar as {"__cols":[names],"__rows":[[values]]}. Lossless, typically 40 to 52 percent fewer tokens.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
daysYes
yearYes
monthYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "properties": {
      +    "days": {
      +      "items": {
      +        "properties": {
      +          "date": {
      +            "type": "string"
      +          },
      +          "positions": {
      +            "items": {
      +              "properties": {
      +                "degreeInSign": {
      +                  "type": "number"
      +                },
      +                "isRetrograde": {
      +                  "type": "boolean"
      +                },
      +                "longitude": {
      +                  "type": "number"
      +                },
      +                "planet": {
      +                  "type": "string"
      +                },
      +                "planetLocalized": {
      +                  "type": "string"
      +                },
      +                "sign": {
      +                  "type": "string"
      +                },
      +                "signLocalized": {
      +                  "type": "string"
      +                }
      +              },
      +              "required": [
      +                "planet",
      +                "longitude",
      +                "sign",
      +                "degreeInSign",
      +                "isRetrograde"
      +              ],
      +              "type": "object"
      +            },
      +            "type": "array"
      +          }
      +        },
      +        "required": [
      +          "date",
      +          "positions"
      +        ],
      +        "type": "object"
      +      },
      +      "type": "array"
      +    },
      +    "month": {
      +      "type": "number"
      +    },
      +    "year": {
      +      "type": "number"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "required": [
      +    "year",
      +    "month",
      +    "days"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  2. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / lang / description
      Previous value: -"Response language (ISO 639-1). Supported: en, tr, de, es, hi, pt, fr, ru. Defaults to en. Languages without translations yet return English."New value: +"Response language (BCP 47). Supported: en, tr, de, es, hi, pt, fr, ru, zh-Hans, zh-Hant. Defaults to en. Coverage varies by domain, and a field with no translation in the requested language returns English."
    • changedInput schema / properties / lang / enum
      Previous value: -[
      -  "en",
      -  "tr",
      -  "de",
      -  "es",
      -  "hi",
      -  "pt",
      -  "fr",
      -  "ru"
      -]New value: +[
      +  "en",
      +  "tr",
      +  "de",
      +  "es",
      +  "hi",
      +  "pt",
      +  "fr",
      +  "ru",
      +  "zh-Hans",
      +  "zh-Hant"
      +]
  3. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / examples
      Added value: +[
      +  {}
      +]
    • changedInput schema / properties / compact / description
      Previous value: -"Set true to receive the exact same data in a token-optimized shape that is cheaper for you to read: whitespace is stripped and every array of same-shaped objects is encoded columnar as {\"__cols\":[field names],\"__rows\":[[values]]}, so each field name is sent once instead of once per row. Fully lossless (no field or value is dropped or changed) and typically 40 to 52 percent fewer tokens on large results. Prefer true whenever token or inference cost matters. Default false returns standard indented JSON."New value: +"Set true for the same data in a compact shape: arrays of same-shaped objects arrive columnar as {\"__cols\":[names],\"__rows\":[[values]]}. Lossless, typically 40 to 52 percent fewer tokens."
  4. Added

TDQS

A4.1/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already mark it read-only and non-destructive; the description adds meaningful behavioral context beyond that: calculations are 'at noon UTC', omitting year/month returns the current month so a published page stays current without redeploy, and data is 'Verified against NASA JPL Horizons.' No contradiction with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The first two sentences front-load the core operation and return fields, with defaults and use cases following. The trailing keyword list ('Monthly ephemeris API, tropical position table...') is somewhat redundant with the opening sentence, so not every sentence earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a read-only endpoint with zero required parameters, rich schema descriptions, and an output schema, the description covers body set, coordinate system, time zone, defaults, output fields, and use cases. Nothing essential for selecting or invoking it is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema carries most parameter meaning. The description adds a useful semantic by framing omitted year/month as an intentional way to get the month in progress, which goes slightly beyond the schema's simple default statements.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific action ('Get'), a precise resource ('daily tropical ecliptic positions for all 14 Western bodies'), and a clear scope ('an entire month'). It is easily distinguishable from aspect, transit, and moon-phase siblings by content, but it never explicitly names an alternative or says what it is not, so it stops short of a 5.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides clear intended use: 'Essential for ephemeris tables, transit tracking, retrograde calendars, and planetary movement charts.' It does not, however, contrast with near-neighbor tools like post_astrology_aspects_monthly or post_astrology_planets, nor give when-not-to-use guidance, so it is not a 5.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources