Skip to main content
Glama

riddle_builder_form

Builds a Form from a build configuration. For full field types see: https://www.riddle.com/help/api/build-riddles/riddle-types-and-other-blocks/form Returns the compact build-configuration envelope of riddle_get (riddle://reference/response-format), with 'queued': true added when queue is set.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
omitNoLeaves parts of the returned envelope out. Values: "build", "warnings", "nextBlockId", "published", "context" (whole sections) and "build.omittedDefaults" (the per-block maps of properties left at their default, inside every build config in the response). Omit for the whole envelope. "uuid"/"type"/"modifiedAt" are always returned. Reach for omit: ["build.omittedDefaults"] on almost every build - it drops ~85-90% of the read-back and loses nothing, since riddle://reference/block-defaults/<block type> states the same defaults; what you must not do either way is resend those values. When you leave anything out the response names it under "omittedFields", so a missing key never means the Riddle has none of it. Same parameter as riddle_get's.
buildYesThe Form build configuration.This is the raw build configuration in the engine's own key names - the exact same shape riddle_get returns under "build", riddle_builder_update takes, and riddle_builder_validate dry-runs, so a read-back can be fed straight back in. Unknown keys are rejected rather than ignored.
queueNoWhether to queue the creation asynchronously.
projectNoThe project ID; pass NULL for personal project; omit to use the currently selected project.
publishNoWhether to publish the Riddle right after creation; default is false (draft). Distinct from the "publish" field INSIDE the build config, which is the stored publish configuration object.
templateIdNoOnly when this build config came from a template you adapted (riddleTemplate_get): the id of that template. Always pass it when you have one: it gives the new Riddle the template's DESIGN in full - its layout, palettes and every preset setting, including the parts no build config can express - with your build config applied on top of it, and it records the new Riddle as a copy of the template's Riddle, the same lineage riddleTemplate_use produces (riddle_get reports it as context.duplicated). The content is entirely yours either way. Omit it for anything you did not build from a template.

TDQS

A4/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The annotations carry only idempotentHint=false, so the description must disclose behavior. It does: it explicitly explains the queued mode — "'queued': true added when queue is set" — and identifies the response as the same compact envelope returned by riddle_get. While it does not expand on other side effects of building a new Riddle, the core behavioral disclosure is reasonable.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is exactly two sentences, front-loaded with a concise, unambiguous action. It uses a link for fuller reference material instead of burying detail in the description, and it ends with a precise enunciation of the return envelope. No sentence is wasted.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given that the tool has complicated build configuration, nested objects, and no output schema, the description still gives a frank and compact return point (the riddle_get build-configuration envelope, with queued when set). The supplied build configuration covers the missing input details, so the whole amplitude is quite complete, though a novice agent might still need to follow the external reference.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already explains all six parameters. The top-level description adds little for parameter semantics; the parameter descriptions are where the real detail lives. Baseline 3 is appropriate because the schema carries the weight.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource: "Builds a Form from a build configuration." It also identifies the return shape by linking to riddle_get's compact build-configuration envelope. It is clear enough to tell this aside from the other riddle_builder_* siblings, though it does not explicitly say it is only for Form-type Riddles.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives usable context by linking to the full field-type documentation and by stating that the response matches riddle_get's envelope. It does not explicitly list exclusions or explicitly compare with sibling builder tools, but the resource name and role are clear, and the referenced build-configuration shape is strong enough guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Disambiguation4/5

Tools are largely distinct by name and detailed descriptions, with clear prefixes (riddle_builder_*, questionBank_*, stats_*). Some potential confusion exists among the stats tools (stats_fetch vs stats_overview_fetch vs breakdowns) but descriptions clarify their different scopes. Overall, an agent can usually pick the right tool.

Naming Consistency4/5

Naming follows a predictable prefix+verb pattern within each domain (e.g., riddle_builder_quiz, riddle_builder_poll; riddle_get, riddle_publish). Minor inconsistencies exist, like the camelCase 'questionBank' and 'riddleTemplate' prefixes vs snake_case elsewhere, and 'stats_overview_fetch' ordering, but these are not chaotic and remain readable.

Tool Count1/5

With 62 tools, this far exceeds the recommended 3-15 range and even the 25+ threshold. While the server covers a broad domain, the extreme number overwhelms and makes tool selection harder, fitting the 'extreme mismatch' criterion for 50+ tools.

Completeness5/5

The tool surface is exceptionally comprehensive, covering creation, reading, updating, deleting, publishing, unpublishing, moving, tagging, template management, question banks, palettes, and various stats breakdowns. There are no obvious gaps in the lifecycle of managing interactive content, and all apparent operations are supported.

Resources