Skip to main content
Glama

project_get_settings

Read-onlyIdempotent

Returns the project's default Riddle settings that every new Riddle in it starts from - PUBLISHED and ENABLED only: "publishSettings" (privacy/DOI/OTP, email automation, tracking, data layer, ...) and "embedSettings" (iframe sizing, auto-scroll, ...), each containing only the areas the project owner has switched on ("isDefaultEnabled"/"isEnabled" toggled on) in the last published version. Draft changes that were never published and disabled areas are deliberately left out - this tool is not a way to inspect unpublished or disabled defaults, only what actually applies to Riddles right now. Internal "_ids" bookkeeping (ID counters for repeatable items like data layer entries) is stripped since it means nothing outside the Creator UI. Both fields are objects keyed by settings area and are always objects - a project with nothing enabled gets {}, never an empty list. Use this to understand what settings a project forces onto its Riddles before creating or editing one in it; project_get is the cheap way to get a project's name, image and permissions instead.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
projectIdYesThe ID of the project whose default Riddle settings to return

TDQS

A4.6/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description goes beyond annotations by disclosing many behavioral details: draft changes and disabled areas are excluded, only last published enabled settings are returned, internal _ids are stripped, and enabled-state fields are always objects rather than empty lists. This gives the agent a strong model of the tool's behavior beyond the readOnly/idempotent hints.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is longer than average, but nearly every clause earns its place by clarifying scope, exclusions, or return-value shape. The main purpose is front-loaded, and the caveats follow logically. It could be tightened slightly, but it is well organized and information-dense.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Even without an output schema, the description explains the return shape in detail: two objects keyed by settings area, empty-object behavior, and which settings areas are included. Given the tool's simplicity (one parameter) and rich annotations, nothing an agent needs to invoke it correctly is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema already documents projectId with 100% clarity. The description doesn't add material semantic detail beyond what the schema says, which is acceptable given the high schema coverage. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb ('Returns') and a precise resource: the project's default Riddle settings, scoped to PUBLISHED and ENABLED defaults. It also distinguishes itself from sibling project_get, which returns name/image/permissions, making the tool's role unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides explicit when-to-use guidance: 'Use this to understand what settings a project forces onto its Riddles before creating or editing one in it.' It also names the alternative project_get and explains what that sibling is better suited for, giving the agent a clear routing rule.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Disambiguation4/5

Tools are largely distinct by name and detailed descriptions, with clear prefixes (riddle_builder_*, questionBank_*, stats_*). Some potential confusion exists among the stats tools (stats_fetch vs stats_overview_fetch vs breakdowns) but descriptions clarify their different scopes. Overall, an agent can usually pick the right tool.

Naming Consistency4/5

Naming follows a predictable prefix+verb pattern within each domain (e.g., riddle_builder_quiz, riddle_builder_poll; riddle_get, riddle_publish). Minor inconsistencies exist, like the camelCase 'questionBank' and 'riddleTemplate' prefixes vs snake_case elsewhere, and 'stats_overview_fetch' ordering, but these are not chaotic and remain readable.

Tool Count1/5

With 62 tools, this far exceeds the recommended 3-15 range and even the 25+ threshold. While the server covers a broad domain, the extreme number overwhelms and makes tool selection harder, fitting the 'extreme mismatch' criterion for 50+ tools.

Completeness5/5

The tool surface is exceptionally comprehensive, covering creation, reading, updating, deleting, publishing, unpublishing, moving, tagging, template management, question banks, palettes, and various stats breakdowns. There are no obvious gaps in the lifecycle of managing interactive content, and all apparent operations are supported.

Resources