Skip to main content
Glama

riddle_template_list

Read-onlyIdempotent

Lists the templates of a project (or your personal ones) - the ones made from your own Riddles with riddle_template_create, NOT Riddle's public ones, which riddle_template_public_list returns. Quick-create templates (isQuickCreate: true) are included alongside the regular ones; there is no separate listing for them. "type" filters by Riddle type. Returns {items: [{id, title, type, blocksCount, image, icon, createdAt, riddle, isPublic, isQuickCreate}], total} - not paginated, so "total" is simply how many there are - without the build configuration - read that with riddle_template_get, or hand the id straight to riddle_template_use.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
typeNoOnly return templates of this Riddle type: "Quiz", "Poll", "Form", "Personality", "Predictor", "Minigame", "Leaderboard", "Story" or "Placeholder". Omit to get all of them.
projectIdNoThe project (team) ID whose templates you want, as returned by project_list. Omit to use the project the API key is scoped to (your personal templates for a user API key).

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. Added

TDQS

A4.7/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnly, idempotent, and closed-world behavior, so the bar is lower, but the description still adds valuable behavioral context: results are not paginated, total means total count, quick-create templates are mixed in, and build configurations are omitted from the response. It also gives the exact response shape, which is especially useful because no output schema exists.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is dense but every clause earns its place: primary purpose, sibling distinction, quick-create behavior, filter guidance, response shape, pagination clarification, and follow-up tool routing. The most important scoping information is front-loaded before any secondary details.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With only two optional params, no output schema, and rich annotations, the description is complete. It explains what is returned, what is not returned, why total behaves as it does, and how to proceed for configuration details or actual usage of a template.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description does not significantly extend parameter meaning beyond what the schema already states for 'type' and 'projectId'; it mainly confirms the filtering behavior.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly identifies the tool as listing project or personal riddle templates created via riddle_template_create, not Riddle's public ones. It names the sibling tool riddle_template_public_list as the alternative, so the agent can distinguish them immediately.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly contrasts this tool with riddle_template_public_list and routes the agent to riddle_template_get for build configuration and riddle_template_use for using a template. It also clarifies that quick-create templates are included here with no separate listing, removing ambiguity about when to call this tool.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4.4/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

Each tool is scoped to a distinct resource/action area: media, palettes, projects, question banks, Riddles, templates, tags, stats, and support. Potentially close pairs like riddle_tag/riddle_tag_delete and question_bank_delete/question_bank_manage are cleanly separated by their descriptions, so an agent can reliably select the right one.

Naming Consistency4/5

The naming is mostly consistent snake_case with strong resource prefixes like riddle_, question_bank_, and template_, followed by clear verbs. Minor deviations such as question_bank_item, riddle_tag, and stats_fetch break the strict verb-noun pattern but remain predictable once the convention is understood.

Tool Count3/5

At 38 tools this is a heavy surface, though the breadth is justified by the many subdomains the server covers: media, palettes, projects, question banks, Riddles, templates, tags, and stats. Most tools earn their place, but the count sits above the range where an agent can quickly survey all options.

Completeness4/5

The set covers the full lifecycle for Riddles, question banks, templates, and tags, including publish/unpublish, move, stats, and media upload/delete. Minor gaps like no media library listing and read-only project settings are workable because media IDs come from upload responses and project permissions are exposed.

Resources