Skip to main content
Glama

questionBank_discardChanges

Destructive

Discards every unpublished change of a question bank, resetting all of its items back to their last published state. An item that was never published (added after the last questionBank_publish) is unaffected - it has no published state to reset to. A questionBank_deleteItem of an already-published item is undone by this too - the item returns to questionBank_getItems as if it had never been deleted, since its published content never left. Irreversible. Rejected for a public template id, see questionBank_templateList.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
questionBankIdYesThe ID of the question bank to discard changes on.

TDQS

A4.5/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare destructiveHint=true and idempotentHint=false. The description goes further by explaining the irreversibility, the specific behavior for unpublished items, and the undo effect on deleteItem. It also discloses the rejection for public template IDs, adding meaningful behavioral context beyond the annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is front-loaded with the core purpose, then covers edge cases and warnings in a logical order. Every sentence contributes essential information without redundancy, making it concise yet thorough.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simple schema, annotations, and lack of output schema, the description is complete. It explains the main action, irreversibility, edge cases, and constraints, providing all context needed for an agent to correctly use the tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema fully documents questionBankId with a clear description. The description adds semantic value by clarifying that the ID must be a question bank ID and that public template IDs will be rejected, which is a constraint not apparent from the schema alone.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool discards every unpublished change and resets items to their last published state. The verb 'discardChanges' and the resource 'question bank' are specific, and the description distinguishes it from siblings like questionBank_publish and questionBank_deleteItem.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explains when this tool is appropriate by detailing effects on never-published items and the reversal of deleteItem operations. It also gives an explicit exclusion: rejection for public template ids, pointing to questionBank_templateList as an alternative. However, it does not explicitly state 'use this when' in a direct comparison to all sibling tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4.1/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

Each tool has a clear, unique purpose. The riddle_builder_* variants are distinct by Riddle type, questionBank_* and riddleTemplate_* cover separate objects, and stats_* differ by scope. No two tools appear to perform the same function.

Naming Consistency4/5

Naming is largely consistent with domain prefixes (riddle_, questionBank_, riddleTemplate_, stats_, project_, palette_, reference_). Minor deviations like riddle_account_list vs. riddle_list and whoami (no prefix) and riddle_get_embed_code vs. riddle_qr_code slightly break the pattern, but overall it is predictable.

Tool Count2/5

With 62 tools, the server is far beyond the typical 3-15 well-scoped range. While each tool is functional and the breadth reflects the platform's complexity, the sheer number makes it heavy and increases the cognitive load for an agent, suggesting over-granularity.

Completeness5/5

The tool set covers the full lifecycle: create (builder variants), read (get/list), update (builder_update, rename), delete, publish/unpublish, tagging, templates, question banks, stats, projects, palettes, and reference documentation. No obvious domain operation is missing.

Resources