Skip to main content
Glama

List Criteria Profile

list_criteria_profile
Read-onlyIdempotent

Read criteria profile with your account's permissions. MCP approval requirements are configurable by the organization administrator; business workflow approvals always apply.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "list_criteria_profile"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
limitNo
offsetNo
searchNo

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dataYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

C2.6/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnly, idempotent, non-destructive and closed-world, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds that results are scoped to the caller's permissions and notes configurable approval requirements, which is extra context, but it omits behavior an agent needs — pagination behavior, ordering, and filter semantics.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short sentences, front-loaded with the core action. However, the second sentence is boilerplate about approval policy that is arguably irrelevant to a read-only list operation and displaces more useful detail.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists so return values needn't be explained, but with 3 undocumented parameters, no listing-versus-get distinction, and no usage guidance, the description leaves significant gaps for an agent to call this correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0% — limit, offset and search have no descriptions — so the description must compensate, and it says nothing about paging, defaults, or what 'search' matches. No semantic value is added beyond parameter names.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose3/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a verb and resource ('Read criteria profile'), but the tool is explicitly a plural listing with pagination/filtering, and the description never says it returns a collection — leaving ambiguity against the sibling get_criteria_profile. Purpose is recognizable but under-specified.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this versus get_criteria_profile or the other criteria tools (create/update/archive/activate). The second sentence covers approvals, which is context rather than a when-to-use rule.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources