Skip to main content
Glama

Delete Budget Template

delete_budget_template
Destructive

Delete a budget template and its normal dependent records. MCP approval requirements are configurable by the organization administrator; business workflow approvals always apply.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "id": "<id>"
    },
    "name": "delete_budget_template"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYes

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dataYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds crucial behavioral context by stating that approval requirements (MCP and business workflow) always apply. This informs the agent that the operation is governed by complex governance rules, which is context beyond the standard destructiveHint=true annotation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The definition is short, but the second sentence is slightly wordy, focusing heavily on administrative configurability rather than the operational implication of the deletion.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The definition explains the 'what' and the governance constraints (approvals), but lacks completeness regarding the consequences of the deletion, such as whether deletion is reversible, or the cascading effects on business metrics.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Since the schema description coverage is 0%, the description must provide semantic value for the 'id' parameter. It fails to do so, providing only a generic definition of the tool itself, offering no guidance on the required ID format or context.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Delete') and the resource ('a budget template'). It implies a high-level deletion, contrasting its scope with item-level deletion tools like delete_budget_template_item.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The tool implies usage for full template removal by mentioning 'dependent records.' While this distinguishes it from item deletion, it does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus a specific alternative sibling tool like delete_budget.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources