Skip to main content
Glama

Apply Checklist Template

apply_checklist_template

Apply checklist items to a site's active checklist; existing titles are deduplicated. MCP approval requirements are configurable by the organization administrator; business workflow approvals always apply.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "id": "<id>",
      "data": "<data>"
    },
    "name": "apply_checklist_template"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYes
dataYes

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dataYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

B3.2/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already state this is not read-only or destructive. The description adds useful behavioral detail: existing titles are deduplicated, and organization-configurable MCP approvals plus mandatory business workflow approvals apply. It does not explain the return shape, but an output schema exists.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences with the main action and deduplication rule front-loaded, followed by relevant approval context. No wasted text.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a mutation tool with a nested data object and no parameter descriptions, the description omits essential mapping between id and the template being applied. Annotations and output schema cover some gaps, but the parameter semantics remain too underspecified.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must explain the parameters. It implies siteId through "site's active checklist" but never explains that id identifies the checklist template, nor clarifies the data wrapper.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource: applying checklist items to a site's active checklist, with deduplication behavior noted. It does not distinguish this from sibling tools such as apply_task_template or create_checklist_item, so it falls short of a 5.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like create_checklist_item or other apply_* template tools. The approval note provides context, but there is no explicit when/when-not instruction.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources