Skip to main content
Glama

remote-jobs

search_remote_jobs

Search current remote / work-from-home job listings curated by Remote Jobs Center. Filter by free-text query, category, region, perk, or company. Returns ready-to-apply links.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
perkNotuition-reimbursement, six-figure, no-degree, entry-level, four-day-week, visa-sponsorship, async, equity, unlimited-pto.
limitNoMax results to return (default 20, max 50).
queryNoFree-text match against job title and company.
regionNoEligibility region: us, uk, europe, canada, latam, apac, worldwide.
companyNoFilter to a company name (substring match).
categoryNoOne of: software, data, design, marketing, sales, support, writing, product, finance, hr.

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. Mentions return of 'ready-to-apply links' but omits details on pagination, rate limits, or read-only nature. Adequate but could be more explicit.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences, no redundancy. Front-loaded with action and resource, followed by filtering options and output indication.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 6 optional parameters and no output schema, description covers primary functionality and filtering. Returns mention is brief but sufficient. Could detail output structure further.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline 3. Description lists filterable fields already present in schema without adding significant new context. No parameter-specific elaboration beyond schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states specific action ('Search current remote job listings'), identifies resource ('curated by Remote Jobs Center'), and lists filtering dimensions, distinguishing it from sibling tools like get_job for single job details.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Implied usage through filtering options but lacks explicit when-to-use guidance or differentiation from siblings. No 'when not to use' or alternative suggestions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.7/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

Each tool targets a distinct entity or action: get_job retrieves a single job, list_categories/list_collections/list_companies list different types of metadata with counts, and search_remote_jobs provides filtered search. No overlapping purposes.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tools follow a consistent `verb_noun` pattern with underscore: get_job, list_categories, list_collections, list_companies, search_remote_jobs. Verbs are appropriately chosen (get, list, search) and nouns clearly indicate the resource.

Tool Count5/5

With 5 tools, the server covers core job browsing and search functionality without being bloated or too sparse. Each tool serves a clear purpose, and the count aligns well with typical API scopes.

Completeness4/5

The tool surface covers job retrieval, browsing categories/collections/companies, and searching jobs. A minor gap is the lack of detailed views for categories or companies beyond counts, but the primary use case of job discovery is well-supported.

Resources