Skip to main content
Glama

Rekvira: EU regulation pinpoints for compliance AI

List playbooks and jobs

list_workflows
Read-onlyIdempotent

Sign-in required: call connect(email) and connect_verify first (free, one email) unless this connection is already signed in. Playbook library for compliance-officer workflows — high-risk triage, DORA ICT review, cross-reg scans, vendor questionnaires. Read a playbook before improvising a process. Pass trial_id from connect to list your own private drafts beside the shipped library. Then call get_workflow with workflow_id from this list.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
limitNoMost rows to return (default 10 on searches, max 50)
sessionNoThe `session` value the sign-in returned. Pass it on every call in this conversation, so the sign-in survives however this client handles connections; omit it when the user connected with Sign in (OAuth) or a key.
trial_idNoOptional trial_id from connect for this client private drafts
max_charsNoCap on the response size in characters (default 8000)

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / session
      Added value: +{
      +  "anyOf": [
      +    {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    {
      +      "type": "null"
      +    }
      +  ],
      +  "default": null,
      +  "description": "The `session` value the sign-in returned. Pass it on every call in this conversation, so the sign-in survives however this client handles connections; omit it when the user connected with Sign in (OAuth) or a key.",
      +  "title": "Session"
      +}
  2. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / limit
      Added value: +{
      +  "anyOf": [
      +    {
      +      "type": "integer"
      +    },
      +    {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    {
      +      "type": "null"
      +    }
      +  ],
      +  "default": null,
      +  "description": "Most rows to return (default 10 on searches, max 50)",
      +  "title": "Limit"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / max_chars
      Added value: +{
      +  "anyOf": [
      +    {
      +      "type": "integer"
      +    },
      +    {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    {
      +      "type": "null"
      +    }
      +  ],
      +  "default": null,
      +  "description": "Cap on the response size in characters (default 8000)",
      +  "title": "Max Chars"
      +}
  3. First observed

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already establish read-only, idempotent, non-destructive and closed-world, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds genuinely non-redundant behavior: an auth/session lifecycle requirement, session continuity across calls, and the fact that trial_id surfaces private drafts alongside the shipped library.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Five sentences, no filler, and the highest-stakes fact (sign-in required) is front-loaded. Slightly verbose in restating auth steps that the session parameter description also covers, but nothing is wasted outright.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For an auth-gated listing tool with no output schema, the description covers the sign-in gate, what the list contains, the trial_id scoping, and the follow-up call. It leaves the return shape (fields per playbook, pagination) unstated, but limit/max_chars in the schema partly compensate.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description adds real meaning on top: it explains trial_id's effect on the result set (own drafts beside the shipped library) and ties session semantics to connection mode, beyond the schema's terse field notes.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a concrete verb+resource ('Playbook library', 'list your own private drafts beside the shipped library') and clarifies it as a browse step distinct from get_workflow, which is named as the drill-down follow-up. It does not differentiate against other list_* siblings (list_assessments, list_regulations), so it falls short of a 5.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicit prerequisites (connect + connect_verify first, or an existing session/OAuth/key), explicit when to use ('Read a playbook before improvising a process'), and explicit next step ('Then call get_workflow with workflow_id from this list'). An agent knows both the gate and the follow-on call.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources