Skip to main content
Glama

RedReplier

List Your Websites

list_websites
Read-only

List the user's own websites saved in their RedReplier account, each with its URL, name, description, and the keywords the user set up for it (ID, text, and status). Reads the account's saved settings only. Use get_website for one website when you have its ID. The website and keyword IDs are the inputs for the other tools.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
workspaceIdNoWorkspace to act in: an id from list_workspaces. Omit to use the default workspace. Use the same workspaceId for every call about the same workspace, since ids from one workspace do not exist in another

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultNoObject with websites: the user's saved websites with IDs, URLs, names, descriptions and keyword statuses.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / properties / result / description
      Previous value: -"Object with websites: monitored websites with IDs, URLs, names, descriptions and keyword statuses."New value: +"Object with websites: the user's saved websites with IDs, URLs, names, descriptions and keyword statuses."
  2. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • removedInput schema / $schema
      Removed value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"
    • removedOutput schema / $schema
      Removed value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"
  3. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / additionalProperties
      Added value: +false
    • addedInput schema / properties / workspaceId
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Workspace to act in: an id from list_workspaces. Omit to use the default workspace. Use the same workspaceId for every call about the same workspace, since ids from one workspace do not exist in another",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
  4. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / properties / result / description
      Previous value: -"Array of monitored websites, each with its ID, URL, name, description, and keywords with their statuses."New value: +"Object with websites: monitored websites with IDs, URLs, names, descriptions and keyword statuses."
  5. First observed

TDQS

A4.3/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, destructiveHint=false, and openWorldHint=false, so the safety profile is covered structurally. The description adds the data scope ('Reads the account's saved settings only'), which is useful, but says nothing about pagination, result limits, or ordering, and the returned-field detail is largely duplicated by the output schema. Adequate but not rich.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three short sentences, front-loaded with what is returned, then the routing rule, then the chaining note. No filler and nothing buried.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With annotations covering the read-only profile, a fully documented single parameter in the schema, and an output schema describing return shape, the description supplies everything else an agent needs: the resource, the sibling routing, and the ID-chaining relationship.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

There is a single optional parameter (workspaceId) with 100% schema description coverage, so the schema already carries the semantics including the cross-workspace ID caveat. The description never mentions workspace scoping, so it adds nothing beyond the schema; the baseline of 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('List the user's own websites saved in their RedReplier account') and enumerates the returned fields, including nested keywords with ID, text, and status. It also distinguishes itself from get_website, so an agent can tell the two apart without opening either schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Names the alternative explicitly and the condition that selects it: 'Use get_website for one website when you have its ID.' It further explains the downstream chaining ('The website and keyword IDs are the inputs for the other tools'), which tells the agent when this call is the prerequisite step.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources