Skip to main content
Glama

RedReplier

Get Keyword Edit Allowance

keyword_change_usage
Read-only

Get the monthly keyword-edit allowance for the account as { limit, used, remaining, unlimited }, where limit -1 means unlimited. Only edit_keyword ever counted toward it; add_keywords, disable_keyword, and enable_keyword never did. Every current plan reports unlimited, so there is no need to check it before edit_keyword; it remains for clients that budget edits. This reports editing allowance only; it does not change keyword capacity, sell a plan, or initiate payment.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
workspaceIdNoWorkspace to act in: an id from list_workspaces. Omit to use the default workspace. Use the same workspaceId for every call about the same workspace, since ids from one workspace do not exist in another

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultNo{ limit, used, remaining, unlimited }; limit -1 and unlimited true mean edits are not metered.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • removedInput schema / $schema
      Removed value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"
    • removedOutput schema / $schema
      Removed value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"
  2. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / additionalProperties
      Added value: +false
    • addedInput schema / properties / workspaceId
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Workspace to act in: an id from list_workspaces. Omit to use the default workspace. Use the same workspaceId for every call about the same workspace, since ids from one workspace do not exist in another",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
  3. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / properties / result / description
      Previous value: -"The monthly keyword-edit allowance limit and the amount used."New value: +"{ limit, used, remaining, unlimited }; limit -1 and unlimited true mean edits are not metered."
  4. First observed

TDQS

A4.7/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already establish readOnlyHint=true, destructiveHint=false, and openWorldHint=false. The description adds valuable behavioral context beyond annotations: only edit_keyword ever counted toward the allowance, add_keywords/disable_keyword/enable_keyword never did, and this tool does not change capacity, sell a plan, or initiate payment.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is front-loaded with the core purpose and return semantics, then adds only high-value disambiguation about counting rules, current-plan behavior, and side effects. Every sentence earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given one optional parameter, full schema coverage, output schema presence, and the tool's reporting role, the description is complete. It explains the response fields, the -1 unlimited convention, usage context, and explicitly rules out unrelated side effects.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has 100% description coverage and documents workspaceId thoroughly, including default behavior and workspace-id scoping. The description does not mention the parameter or add meaning beyond the schema, so the baseline of 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('Get the monthly keyword-edit allowance') and describes the returned fields directly. It also distinguishes this reporting tool from edit_keyword and the other keyword mutation siblings by explaining which operations count toward the allowance.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly says there is no need to check it before edit_keyword because every current plan reports unlimited, and clarifies it remains for clients that budget edits. This gives both when-to-use and when-not-to-use guidance relative to a named sibling.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources