Skip to main content
Glama

RedReplier

Delete Keyword

delete_keyword
Destructive

Permanently delete one keyword in any status, together with every mention it produced. There is no undo and no restore: disable_keyword pauses a keyword and keeps its mentions, edit_keyword fixes a SUSPENDED value, and delete_website drops a whole site. Deleting an active keyword frees a plan slot, so the oldest pending keyword that now fits the plan may become active, which queues public-network searches and ranking checks; this tool does not issue a refund or change the subscription. Confirm with the user first and name the keyword, not just the ID. Returns { deleted: true }; 404 if the ID is unknown to this account.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
keywordIdYesKeyword ID (UUID)
workspaceIdNoWorkspace to act in: an id from list_workspaces. Omit to use the default workspace. Use the same workspaceId for every call about the same workspace, since ids from one workspace do not exist in another

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultNo{ deleted: true } once the keyword and its mentions are removed.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • removedInput schema / $schema
      Removed value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"
    • removedOutput schema / $schema
      Removed value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"
  2. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / workspaceId
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Workspace to act in: an id from list_workspaces. Omit to use the default workspace. Use the same workspaceId for every call about the same workspace, since ids from one workspace do not exist in another",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
  3. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / properties / result / description
      Previous value: -"{ deleted: true } once the PENDING keyword is removed."New value: +"{ deleted: true } once the keyword and its mentions are removed."
  4. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / properties / result / description
      Previous value: -"Confirmation that the keyword was deleted."New value: +"{ deleted: true } once the PENDING keyword is removed."
  5. First observed

TDQS

A4.7/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already flag destructive/openWorld/non-readOnly, but the description adds substantial context beyond them: no undo or restore, the plan-slot cascade that can activate the oldest pending keyword and queue public-network searches and ranking checks, and the absence of a refund or subscription change. These are non-obvious side effects an agent must warn about before calling.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Front-loaded with the irreversible action, then siblings, then side effects, then confirmation and return/error behavior. Despite its length, every sentence carries distinct decision-relevant information with no filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a destructive, open-world mutation, it covers irreversibility, cascading side effects, sibling alternatives, confirmation requirements, and error behavior (404 for unknown ID). An output schema exists, yet the description still notes the return shape, so nothing needed to call it safely is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so both keywordId and workspaceId are already documented in the schema, establishing the baseline of 3. The description adds only the workflow hint to name the keyword rather than just the ID, which is marginal beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb+resource ('Permanently delete one keyword') with explicit scope ('in any status, together with every mention it produced'). It immediately names the sibling tools it is not (disable_keyword, edit_keyword, delete_website) and the conditions that separate them, so an agent can disambiguate without opening any schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives explicit when-to-use and when-not routing: disable_keyword to pause and keep mentions, edit_keyword for a SUSPENDED value, delete_website for a whole site. It also adds a precondition ('Confirm with the user first and name the keyword, not just the ID'), leaving nothing to inference.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources