Leer un artículo completo
get_postDevuelve el contenido completo de un artículo del blog por su slug.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| slug | Yes | Slug del post, ej: 'el-poder-del-scl' |
get_postDevuelve el contenido completo de un artículo del blog por su slug.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| slug | Yes | Slug del post, ej: 'el-poder-del-scl' |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already provide readOnlyHint=true. The description adds that it returns 'full content' but does not elaborate on what that includes or any other behavioral traits beyond the schema.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, 10 words, front-loaded with purpose. No wasted words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The tool is simple but lacks output schema or details on response structure. The description 'full content' is vague; agent cannot infer what fields are returned. No mention of error handling.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100% and the description does not add additional meaning beyond what the parameter's schema already provides. Baseline of 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states it returns the full content of a blog article by slug, using a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from sibling tools like get_author or get_latest_posts.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No explicit guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives like search_posts or get_category_posts. The description implies use when you have a slug, but no exclusions or when-not-to-use.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.