Últimos artículos
get_latest_postsLista los artículos más recientes del blog.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | No | Máximo de resultados (por defecto 10) |
get_latest_postsLista los artículos más recientes del blog.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | No | Máximo de resultados (por defecto 10) |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare readOnlyHint: true, so safety is known. Description adds no additional behavioral traits (e.g., ordering, pagination). Adequate but no extra value beyond annotations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, no unnecessary words, perfectly concise for a simple tool.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Tool is simple with one optional param and read-only, but description lacks mention of ordering (e.g., by date) or what constitutes 'latest'. Minimally adequate but could be more complete.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% and the parameter 'limit' has a clear description in the schema. The tool description adds nothing beyond the schema, so baseline 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states it lists the latest blog posts, with a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from sibling tools like get_post (single) and search_posts (search).
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives. Does not mention when not to use it or any prerequisites. Context signals show many sibling tools but description lacks differentiation.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.