Artículos de una categoría
get_category_postsLista los artículos de una categoría del blog.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| slug | Yes | Slug de la categoría | |
| limit | No | Máximo de resultados |
get_category_postsLista los artículos de una categoría del blog.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| slug | Yes | Slug de la categoría | |
| limit | No | Máximo de resultados |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already provide readOnlyHint=true; the description adds no extra behavioral details like ordering or pagination, beyond confirming it's a list operation.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Extremely concise: one sentence clearly communicates the purpose with no redundant information.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple listing tool with two parameters and no output schema, the description is adequate. Minor omission: no mention of result ordering or pagination limits beyond the 'limit' parameter.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, so the schema documents both parameters; the description adds no additional meaning beyond the parameter descriptions.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states it lists articles of a category, distinguishing it from siblings like get_post (single article) and search_posts (search functionality).
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies use when needing posts by category, but lacks explicit guidance on when not to use it or alternatives among siblings.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.