Skip to main content
Glama

Setup runs

list_setup_runs
Read-onlyIdempotent

The project's setup runs, newest first: when, by which key, what each created, changed and deleted, and whether it has been undone. Use it to find a run to undo, or to see what an earlier session already set up.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "list_setup_runs"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
pageNoPage number, from 1.
limitNoRuns per page, 1-100. Default 50.
projectNoProject ID, from list_projects. Required when this connection covers more than one project; may be left out when it covers one (and with an API key, which belongs to one project).

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A4/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, and openWorldHint=false. The description adds useful behavioral context beyond that: newest-first ordering and the fact that each run includes created, changed, deleted, and undone status.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, front-loaded with the resource and ordering, then the usage guidance. There is no redundant or filler text.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, the description usefully enumerates the returned information (when, by which key, changes, undo status). Parameters are schema-documented and annotations cover safety, leaving only a minor gap around explicit sibling selection.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so page, limit, and project are already fully documented in the input schema. The description only implies project scoping via "The project's setup runs" and adds no parameter detail beyond the schema baseline.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly identifies the resource as the project's setup runs and specifies ordering (newest first) plus the fields returned. It does not explicitly differentiate itself from the sibling get_setup_run, but the listing purpose is clear.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It gives concrete use cases: finding a run to undo or seeing what an earlier session set up. It does not explicitly state when to use get_setup_run instead, so the alternative is implied rather than spelled out.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources