Skip to main content
Glama

Portravo Construction Takeoff

Connected Portravo account

get_profile
Read-onlyIdempotent

Use first after connecting to confirm which Portravo account you are acting on: returns the account id, name and email. Read-only; the remaining takeoff credits are in preflight_takeoff.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "get_profile"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYes
nameNo
emailNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A4.7/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, and destructiveHint=false, so the safety profile is largely covered and the description's 'Read-only' restatement is mild redundancy. It still adds real value by scoping the returned identity fields and redirecting credit inquiries to preflight_takeoff, a behavior the annotations cannot express.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single front-loaded sentence opens with the timing ('Use first after connecting') and then the return content, with the sibling cross-reference last. Every clause conveys information an agent needs; nothing is padding.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a parameterless identity-check tool with an output schema present, the description covers purpose, timing, safety, and the boundary with the credits sibling. Nothing an agent needs to invoke it correctly is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool takes zero parameters, so the baseline is 4; there is no parameter meaning the description could add or omit. Schema coverage is 100% regardless, and the empty object schema matches the no-argument description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('confirm which Portravo account you are acting on: returns the account id, name and email') and explicitly distinguishes itself from the sibling preflight_takeoff by saying credits live there. An agent can tell exactly what this tool yields without opening the schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives an explicit trigger ('Use first after connecting') plus a routing rule for the adjacent need (remaining takeoff credits are in preflight_takeoff). There are no parameters or destructive paths requiring exclusions, so nothing is left to inference.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources