Skip to main content
Glama

query_docs_filesystem_political_comms

Read-onlyIdempotent

Run a read-only shell-like query against a virtualized, in-memory filesystem rooted at / that contains ONLY the Political Comms documentation pages and OpenAPI specs. This is NOT a shell on any real machine — nothing runs on the user's computer, the server host, or any network. The filesystem is a sandbox backed by documentation chunks.

This is how you read documentation pages: there is no separate "get page" tool. To read a page, pass its .mdx path to head or cat — a page at the URL path /some/page lives at /some/page.mdx. To search the docs with exact keyword or regex matches, use rg. To understand the docs structure, use tree or ls.

Paths are specific to this site — never guess them. Discover real paths with tree / -L 2, ls /, or the search tool before reading. If a path does not exist, that only means the guess was wrong; it does NOT mean the topic is undocumented — use rg -il "keyword" / to find where it is covered.

Workflow: Start with the search tool for broad or conceptual queries like "how to authenticate" or "rate limiting". Use this tool when you need exact keyword/regex matching, structural exploration, or to read the full content of a specific page by path.

Supported commands: rg (ripgrep), grep, find, tree, ls, cat, head, tail, stat, wc, sort, uniq, cut, sed, awk, jq, plus basic text utilities. No writes, no network, no process control. Run --help on any command for usage.

Each call is STATELESS: the working directory always resets to / and no shell variables, aliases, or history carry over between calls. If you need to operate in a subdirectory, chain commands in one call with && or pass absolute paths (e.g., cd /some-directory && ls or ls /some-directory). Do NOT assume that cd in one call affects the next call.

Examples (replace the placeholder paths with real ones from tree or search):

  • tree / -L 2 — see the top-level directory layout

  • rg -il "rate limit" / — find all files mentioning "rate limit"

  • rg -C 3 "apiKey" /some-directory/ — show matches with 3 lines of context around each hit

  • head -80 /some/page.mdx — read the top 80 lines of a specific page

  • head -80 /page-one.mdx /page-two.mdx /section/page-three.mdx — read multiple pages in one call

  • cat /some/page.mdx — read a full page when you need everything

  • cat /openapi/api-reference/openapi.json | jq '.paths | keys' — list OpenAPI endpoints

OpenAPI specs for this site are mounted at: /openapi/api-reference/openapi.json. Use them to answer questions about endpoints, request/response schemas, parameters, and authentication.

Output is truncated to 30KB per call. Prefer targeted rg -C or head -N over broad cat on large files. To read only the relevant sections of a large file, use rg -C 3 "pattern" /path/file.mdx. Batch multiple file reads into a single head or cat call whenever possible.

When referencing pages in your response to the user, convert filesystem paths to URL paths by removing the .mdx extension. For example, /some/page.mdx becomes /some/page.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
commandYesA shell command to run against the virtualized documentation filesystem (e.g., `rg -il "keyword" /`, `tree / -L 2`, `head -80 /path/file.mdx`).

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • removedInput schema / $schema
      Removed value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"
  2. First observed

TDQS

A5/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, and destructiveHint, but the description adds substantial behavioral context beyond them: it is a sandbox, not a real machine; there is no network or process control; each call is stateless; output is truncated to 30KB; and paths must be discovered rather than guessed. No contradiction with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Although long, the description is dense and every section earns its place: safety model, command list, statelessness warning, path resolution, usage examples, OpenAPI mount, truncation, and URL conversion. It is well-structured with bold headers and a front-loaded summary of what the tool is.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a single-parameter shell-like tool with no output schema, the description is remarkably complete: it covers supported commands, safety boundaries, state behavior, path discovery, file-to-URL conversion, OpenAPI location, output limits, and batching guidance. There are no critical gaps for an agent to call it correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters5/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The single `command` parameter has a good schema description, but the tool description goes far beyond it with supported command lists, path conventions (.mdx mapping), statelessness guidance, chaining with `&&`, and concrete examples. This meaningfully enriches the parameter semantics.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description opens with a precise verb and resource: 'Run a read-only shell-like query against a virtualized, in-memory filesystem rooted at `/`' containing only Political Comms docs and OpenAPI specs. It explicitly distinguishes itself from a real shell, and by naming search_political_comms as the broad-search sibling, it makes selection obvious.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives an explicit workflow: use search_political_comms for broad/conceptual queries, and use this tool for exact keyword/regex matching, structural exploration, or reading full pages. It also says to discover paths with `tree`, `ls`, or search before reading, and warns against guessing paths.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources