Skip to main content
Glama

Get Project Tool

get-project-tool
Read-onlyIdempotent

Fetch a single project by its numeric id. Optionally pass include to load the parent organization.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "project_id": "<project_id>"
    },
    "name": "get-project-tool"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
includeNoOptional comma-separated related resources to include in the response. Whitelisted: `organization`.
project_idYesThe numeric id of the project to fetch.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The annotations already declare read-only, idempotent, non-destructive, and closed-world behavior, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds that the call is scoped to one project and that include loads the parent organization, but it does not describe permissions, rate limits, not-found behavior, or the returned shape.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences are used with no filler, and the core scoping rule is front-loaded. The optional include behavior follows immediately and does not obscure the main operation.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple get-by-id tool with fully described parameters and strong annotations, the description covers the essential operation and the optional related-resource include. It could be slightly more complete by mentioning return behavior or failure handling, but those are minor gaps for this tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so both parameters are already documented with their types and constraints. The description repeats numeric id and include purpose, adding only the nuance that the included organization is the parent, which is useful but limited beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource: fetch a single project by numeric id. That clearly separates it from the create, update, and delete project siblings, which are mutations, and makes the read scope unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies when to use it by tying the call to a single numeric project id and mentioning the optional include for the parent organization. However, it does not explicitly compare this tool with alternatives such as get-organization-tool or state when-not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources