Skip to main content
Glama

Read the brand's goal

get_goal
Read-onlyIdempotent

See how many new faces or returning members a brand has toward its goal, the target, the deadline and whether it's on pace. Returns null when no goal is set.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "brandId": "<brandId>"
    },
    "name": "get_goal"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
brandIdYesBrand ID, the project Doo runs.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already cover read-only, idempotent, non-destructive, and closed-world behavior. The description adds useful context beyond annotations by stating what information is returned and that the result is null when no goal is set.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two tight sentences, front-loads the operation and returned information, and includes the important null case without waste.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple read tool with one well-documented parameter and full annotations, the description is nearly complete. It summarizes the returned goal information and null behavior; without an output schema, more detail on exact return structure could help, but the essentials are present.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

There is only one parameter and schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already fully explains brandId. The description mentions 'a brand' but does not add meaningful detail beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states a read operation on a brand goal and names the returned concepts: progress, target, deadline, and pace. It does not explicitly name the sibling set_goal or contrast write vs read, but the name and title make the read-only purpose obvious.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is implied: this is the tool for inspecting an existing goal. The null-return note implicitly covers the no-goal-set case, but there is no explicit guidance on when to use get_goal versus set_goal or other sibling tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources