Skip to main content
Glama

Perisclaw: Use ChatGPT and Claude with your WhatsApp

Connected account

get_profile
Read-only

Use this when you need to know which WhatsApp account this connection uses, for example when the user has several Perisclaw connections. Returns a stable account id and the phone number.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "get_profile"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYes
nameYes
nicknameYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, destructiveHint=false, and openWorldHint=false, and the description is consistent with that read-only, connection-local profile. It adds genuine context beyond annotations by stating the identity is a "stable" account id and that the response includes the phone number.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences: the usage condition first, the return contents second. No filler, no restating of the title.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a zero-param, read-only lookup with an output schema and full annotations, everything an agent needs is covered: when to reach for it, that it is connection-scoped, and roughly what comes back.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool takes zero parameters, so the baseline is 4. The description correctly says nothing about inputs, avoiding noise about a parameter surface that does not exist.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description names a specific resource and effect: retrieving which WhatsApp account the current connection is bound to, plus the returned id and phone number. That is enough to distinguish it from all siblings (message, chat, contact, automation tools), though it does not explicitly name a contrasting sibling.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

"Use this when you need to know which WhatsApp account this connection uses" states the triggering condition, and the multi-connection example gives a concrete scenario. No when-not-to-use exclusion is stated, but the scope is narrow enough that none is realistically needed.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.