Get full details for one Pawlisty listing by id. Use after search_pet_listings when the user wants more on a specific pet. To contact the seller the user must visit the listing page.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Listing id. |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. It implies a read operation but does not explicitly state read-only, nor mention authentication requirements or whether the response includes all fields. Adequate but could be more precise.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two concise sentences: first states purpose and usage context, second adds a practical limitation. No unnecessary words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple retrieval tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description covers what it does, when to use, and a key limitation. Could hint at the structure of 'full details' but is sufficient as is.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Only one parameter with schema description 'Listing id.' Description adds little beyond the schema (just 'by id'). With 100% schema coverage, baseline 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Clearly states the action ('Get full details'), the resource ('Pawlisty listing'), and the identifier ('by id'). Distinguishes from sibling 'search_pet_listings' which searches instead of retrieving a single record.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Explicitly tells when to use this tool ('after search_pet_listings when the user wants more on a specific pet') and what not to expect ('To contact the seller the user must visit the listing page').
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
Each tool has a clear, distinct purpose: browsing breeds, getting buyer safety info, retrieving listing details, and searching listings. No overlap or confusion possible.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (browse_breeds, get_buying_guide, get_pet_listing, search_pet_listings).
With 4 tools covering breed info, safety guidance, listing details, and search, the set is well-scoped for a buyer-focused pet listing service.
Covers core buyer workflows (search, detail, breed research, safety). Minor gap: no tool to list all available species or filter by more attributes, but not a critical omission.
