Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 77%, so most params are already documented. The description reinforces the highest-risk ones (retention erasing data, sign_out_all, ai_read, template-driven lists) but adds little mechanics, and several params (confirm_token, request_note, notify_members) get no mention anywhere. Baseline 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.