Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 67% with an output schema present. The description usefully maps the `type` enum categories (publishing, rollbacks, people, domains, settings, protection, visitor data, AI apps, billing) and the newest-first ordering clarifies how `before` pagination works, adding meaning beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.