Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
An output schema exists, so return values need not be explained in depth, and the annotations cover the destructive profile. Still, for a destructive open-world tool with low schema coverage, the description should more clearly explain the confirmation flow, site_token usage, and what happens on a failed or missing confirmation.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.