Skip to main content
Glama

OwlCAD

by com.owlcad.mcp
OverviewDiscussionsAdmin

Update a project

update_project
Destructive

Replace the geometry of one of your existing projects, keeping its id, link and history. Pass the version you got from get_project — if the project has changed since, the update is refused rather than silently overwriting that change. Use this instead of save_project when iterating, so a person keeps one link.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
nameNoRename the project at the same time (optional).
scadNoOpenSCAD source, as an alternative to `nodes`. Saved as the editor’s .scad import saves it: top-level options become project variables, but one that picks an if/for is fixed, and part names are generated. For a fully live script send it in `nodes` as a scad generator.
nodesNoParametric node tree. mm, Z-up, rotations in DEGREES (a rotation.* binding: radians). Read owlcad://schema/primitives for every primitive, modifier and generator and its parameter ranges (unknown params are dropped silently), and owlcad://schema/conventions for the placement arithmetic, which is where most models go wrong.
versionYesThe `version` get_project reported. A mismatch means someone else changed it — re-read and retry.
projectIdYesThe project to overwrite.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / nodes / items / properties / generatorKey / description
      Previous value: -"Generator to expand (kind=generator). PREFER one over hand-building the same thing — they carry standards dimensions and solve fits a tree of primitives gets subtly wrong: gearTrain · planetary · rackPinion · wormDrive · herringbone · herringboneTrain · pulley · bearing · belt · spring · adapter · boardMount · enclosure · gridfinity · threadedJar · pinHinge · snapFit · ballSocket · fastener · textPlate · fitCoupon · calibrationBlock · clamp · impeller · axialFan · fanFrame · plugCap · pillowBlock."New value: +"Generator to expand (kind=generator). PREFER one over hand-building the same thing — they carry standards dimensions and solve fits a tree of primitives gets subtly wrong: gearTrain · planetary · rackPinion · wormDrive · bevelPair · herringbone · herringboneTrain · pulley · bearing · belt · spring · adapter · boardMount · enclosure · gridfinity · threadedJar · pinHinge · snapFit · ballSocket · fastener · textPlate · fitCoupon · calibrationBlock · clamp · impeller · axialFan · fanFrame · plugCap · pillowBlock."
  2. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / nodes / description
      Previous value: -"Parametric node tree. mm, Z-up, rotations in DEGREES. Read owlcad://schema/primitives for every primitive, modifier and generator and its parameter ranges (unknown params are dropped silently), and owlcad://schema/conventions for the placement arithmetic, which is where most models go wrong."New value: +"Parametric node tree. mm, Z-up, rotations in DEGREES (a rotation.* binding: radians). Read owlcad://schema/primitives for every primitive, modifier and generator and its parameter ranges (unknown params are dropped silently), and owlcad://schema/conventions for the placement arithmetic, which is where most models go wrong."
  3. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / scad / description
      Previous value: -"OpenSCAD source, as an alternative to `nodes` (supply exactly one). Interpreted by the same engine the editor’s .scad import uses; BOSL2/MCAD includes resolve. minkowski() and resize() are not supported here — use hull() or offset()."New value: +"OpenSCAD source, as an alternative to `nodes`. Saved as the editor’s .scad import saves it: top-level options become project variables, but one that picks an if/for is fixed, and part names are generated. For a fully live script send it in `nodes` as a scad generator."
  4. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / nodes / items / properties / generatorKey / description
      Previous value: -"Generator to expand (kind=generator). PREFER one over hand-building the same thing — they carry standards dimensions and solve fits a tree of primitives gets subtly wrong: gearTrain · planetary · rackPinion · wormDrive · herringbone · herringboneTrain · pulley · bearing · belt · spring · adapter · boardMount · enclosure · gridfinity · threadedJar · pinHinge · snapFit · ballSocket · fastener · textPlate · fitCoupon · calibrationBlock · clamp · impeller · axialFan · fanFrame · plugCap."New value: +"Generator to expand (kind=generator). PREFER one over hand-building the same thing — they carry standards dimensions and solve fits a tree of primitives gets subtly wrong: gearTrain · planetary · rackPinion · wormDrive · herringbone · herringboneTrain · pulley · bearing · belt · spring · adapter · boardMount · enclosure · gridfinity · threadedJar · pinHinge · snapFit · ballSocket · fastener · textPlate · fitCoupon · calibrationBlock · clamp · impeller · axialFan · fanFrame · plugCap · pillowBlock."
  5. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / scad / description
      Previous value: -"OpenSCAD source, as an alternative to `nodes` (supply exactly one). Interpreted by the same engine the editor’s .scad import uses. minkowski() and resize() are not supported here — use hull() or offset()."New value: +"OpenSCAD source, as an alternative to `nodes` (supply exactly one). Interpreted by the same engine the editor’s .scad import uses; BOSL2/MCAD includes resolve. minkowski() and resize() are not supported here — use hull() or offset()."
  6. First observed

TDQS

A4.6/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare destructiveHint=true and idempotentHint=false, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds genuinely new behavior: optimistic concurrency ("if the project has changed since, the update is refused rather than silently overwriting") and the preservation of id/link/history, which tells the agent this is a replace-in-place rather than a new artifact.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three tight sentences, front-loaded with what is replaced and what is kept, followed by the concurrency rule and then the sibling routing. No filler or restated title.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a destructive, non-idempotent mutation with annotations covering safety, the description covers replacement scope, preservation, concurrency and sibling routing. Minor gaps remain: it never says what the call returns (no output schema exists) and does not mention permission requirements.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so all five parameters (including version's mismatch semantics) are already documented in the schema. The description restates the version/refusal rule in workflow terms but adds no syntax or format detail beyond it, and says nothing about name, scad or nodes. Baseline 3 applies when the schema carries the parameter burden.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Specific verb+resource ("Replace the geometry of one of your existing projects") with the preservation guarantee spelled out (id, link, history). It also explicitly names the sibling it should not be confused with (save_project), so an agent can disambiguate without opening either schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives an explicit alternative and the condition that selects it: "Use this instead of save_project when iterating, so a person keeps one link." It also states the workflow prerequisite (pass the version you got from get_project) and the failure mode when the precondition is violated.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All OwlCAD toolsInspect
Try in Browser
Shareable, User-Owned Context BackendPeople, applications, and agents read, write, and coordinate together in one context lake. Reach it over MCP, a CLI, a Python SDK, or REST.fulcradynamics.comAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources