Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, so every parameter is already described in the schema. The description adds a few clarifications (e.g., full token map replacement, default uniqueness) but largely paraphrases the schema. Baseline 3 is appropriate because the schema carries the primary semantic load.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.