Skip to main content
Glama

Oviond

by com.oviond.api
OverviewDiscussionsAdmin

List reports and dashboards

list_reports
Read-only

List reports and dashboards for the account, optionally filtered by client.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
pageNoPage number (0-indexed)
limitNoResults per page, 1-200 (default 50)
client_idNoFilter by client ID (from list_clients)

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dataNoOne row per report — id, name, type (REPORT or DASHBOARD), the client it belongs to, its theme, date_range and share settings.
metaNoPage, limit and total row count.
successYesTrue when the call succeeded.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed4 schema fields changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / limit / description
      Previous value: -"Results per page"New value: +"Results per page, 1-200 (default 50)"
    • addedInput schema / properties / limit / maximum
      Added value: +200
    • addedInput schema / properties / limit / minimum
      Added value: +1
    • changedInput schema / properties / limit / type
      Previous value: -"number"New value: +"integer"
  2. Changed7 schema fields changed
    • removedInput schema / $schema
      Removed value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"
    • removedOutput schema / $schema
      Removed value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"
    • changedOutput schema / properties / meta / description
      Previous value: -"Pagination for the list — page, limit and the total row count."New value: +"Page, limit and total row count."
    • changedOutput schema / properties / meta / properties / limit / description
      Previous value: -"Maximum rows per page."New value: +"Max rows per page."
    • changedOutput schema / properties / meta / properties / page / description
      Previous value: -"Zero-based index of the page returned."New value: +"Page index, zero-based."
    • changedOutput schema / properties / meta / properties / total / description
      Previous value: -"Total rows matching the query across all pages."New value: +"Total rows matching the query."
    • changedOutput schema / properties / success / description
      Previous value: -"True when the call succeeded. A failure comes back as an error result instead."New value: +"True when the call succeeded."
  3. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
+  "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
+  "additionalProperties": false,
+  "properties": {
+    "data": {
+      "description": "One row per report — id, name, type (REPORT or DASHBOARD), the client it belongs to, its theme, date_range and share settings.",
+      "items": {},
+      "type": "array"
+    },
+    "meta": {
+      "additionalProperties": true,
+      "description": "Pagination for the list — page, limit and the total row count.",
+      "properties": {
+        "limit": {
+          "description": "Maximum rows per page.",
+          "type": "number"
+        },
+        "page": {
+          "description": "Zero-based index of the page returned.",
+          "type": "number"
+        },
+        "total": {
+          "description": "Total rows matching the query across all pages.",
+          "type": "number"
+        }
+      },
+      "type": "object"
+    },
+    "success": {
+      "description": "True when the call succeeded. A failure comes back as an error result instead.",
+      "type": "boolean"
+    }
+  },
+  "required": [
+    "success"
+  ],
+  "type": "object"
+}
  4. First observed

TDQS

A3.6/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, destructiveHint=false and openWorldHint=false, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds the account-scoping constraint ('for the account'), which is genuinely useful context, but it says nothing about pagination behavior beyond what the schema already exposes.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single tight sentence with the scope stated first and the optional filter second. Every word earns its place and nothing is padded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple paginated list tool with a full output schema, the description covers scope, filter and the read-only nature implied by annotations. Return values and pagination defaults correctly live in the schema, so the definition is nearly complete, losing only a little for not contrasting with the single-report sibling.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, with page, limit and client_id all documented (including bounds and the list_clients cross-reference), so the baseline is 3. The description only restates the client filter and adds no format or behavior detail beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb ('List') and resource ('reports and dashboards') scoped to the account, which clearly distinguishes it from get_report (single item) and the many create/archive_report siblings. It stops short of explicitly naming any sibling it should be chosen over, so it is clear but not fully differentiated.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

'Optionally filtered by client' implies the useful filtering scenario, but there is no explicit when-to-use guidance, no mention of when to prefer get_report or list_assets instead, and no exclusions or prerequisites. Usage is only weakly implied.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Oviond toolsInspect
Try in Browser
One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources