Skip to main content
Glama

Create report page

create_page

Add a page to a report or template. Appended at the end by default.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
nameYesPage name
visibleNoWhether the page is visible (defaults to true)
positionNoPosition (1-indexed); omit to append at the end
source_idYesReport or template ID this page belongs to (from list_reports or list_templates)
source_typeYesSource type

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dataNoThe new page — page_id, name, position and visible. Pass page_id when adding widgets.
successYesTrue when the call succeeded. A failure comes back as an error result instead.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
      +  "additionalProperties": false,
      +  "properties": {
      +    "data": {
      +      "additionalProperties": {},
      +      "description": "The new page — page_id, name, position and visible. Pass page_id when adding widgets.",
      +      "type": "object"
      +    },
      +    "success": {
      +      "description": "True when the call succeeded. A failure comes back as an error result instead.",
      +      "type": "boolean"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "required": [
      +    "success"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  2. First observed

TDQS

A4/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description discloses a useful behavioral detail beyond the annotations: pages are appended at the end by default. It does not contradict the annotations (readOnlyHint=false, destructiveHint=false), and the write nature is consistent with the operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two short sentences with no filler. The core action is front-loaded, and the only additional behavior mentioned (append by default) is relevant and concise.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the high schema coverage, an output schema, and annotations indicating a non-read-only, non-destructive mutation, this description is largely sufficient for an agent to invoke the tool correctly. It could explicitly note that the page is added to an existing report/template, but the required source_id and source_type parameters already convey that.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents all parameters and their meanings. The description echoes the report/template target and the append-by-default position behavior, but it does not add substantial new parameter-level detail beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb ('Add') and names the exact resource ('a page') and target ('report or template'), which clearly distinguishes it from siblings like create_report, add_report_section, update_page, and delete_page. It is not a tautology and goes beyond the title.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The intended context is implied: this tool adds a page to an existing report or template. However, there is no explicit guidance about when to choose this tool over related alternatives such as add_report_section or create_report, and no exclusions are stated.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources